Ad is loading...
MNOSX vs RERBX
MNOSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts MNOSX vs RERBX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series S
Price$32.68
Change+$0.85 (+2.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.61M
American Funds Europacific Growth R2
Price$49.81
Change+$0.84 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.48B
MNOSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOSX vs. RERBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOSX is a Buy and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 116B vs. MNOSX (324M). MNOSX pays higher dividends than RERBX: MNOSX (0.97) vs RERBX (0.48). MNOSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: MNOSX (7 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than MNOSX (1.14). MNOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RERBX (30.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOSX: RERBX (250) vs MNOSX (2000). MNOSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.00 vs. RERBX (-9.41). MNOSX return over 5 years is better than : 55.26 vs. RERBX (17.49).
| MNOSX | RERBX | MNOSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.56 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.56 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.057 | -2.045 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324M | 116B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.48 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.00 | -9.41 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.43 | -3.26 | -167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.26 | 17.49 | 316% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.92 | - |