Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNOSX vs RERGX
MNOSX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts MNOSX vs RERGX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series S
Price$36.05
Change-$0.07 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.12M
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$63.97
Change-$0.27 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.22B
MNOSX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOSX vs. RERGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOSX is a Hold and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. MNOSX (326M). MNOSX (0.89) and RERGX (0.87) have matching dividends . MNOSX was incepted earlier than RERGX: MNOSX (7 years) vs RERGX (17 years). MNOSX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). MNOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RERGX (35.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOSX: RERGX (250) vs MNOSX (2000). RERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.42 vs. MNOSX (12.15). MNOSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.72 vs. RERGX (5.13).
| MNOSX | RERGX | MNOSX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.47 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.47 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.279 | 19.080 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 132B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.87 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.15 | 13.42 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.32 | 32.37 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.72 | 5.13 | 443% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement