Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNOZX vs REEBX
MNOZX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts MNOZX vs REEBX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.52
Change+$0.11 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets362.26M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$61.08
Change+$0.36 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.22B
MNOZX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOZX vs. REEBX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOZX is a StrongBuy and REEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. MNOZX (362M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than REEBX: MNOZX (1.26) vs REEBX (0.43). MNOZX was incepted earlier than REEBX: MNOZX (7 years) vs REEBX (11 years). REEBX (1.27) is less costly to investors than MNOZX (0.71). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. REEBX (35.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: REEBX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). MNOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.34 vs. REEBX (7.65). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 36.61 vs. REEBX (10.59).
| MNOZX | REEBX | MNOZX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.27 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.27 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.286 | 15.791 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 362M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.43 | 294% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.34 | 7.65 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.27 | 23.24 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.61 | 10.59 | 346% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers