MNRIF
Price
$0.81
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 26 closing price
SHALF
Price
$0.69
Change
+$0.08 (+13.11%)
Updated
Oct 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

MNRIF vs SHALF

Header iconMNRIF vs SHALF Comparison
Open Charts MNRIF vs SHALFBanner chart's image
Minor International Public
Price$0.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$31K
CapitalizationN/A
Shangri-La Asia
Price$0.69
Change+$0.08 (+13.11%)
Volume$56K
CapitalizationN/A
MNRIF vs SHALF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SHALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNRIF vs. SHALF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNRIF is a Hold and SHALF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MNRIF: $0.81 vs. SHALF: $0.69)
Brand notoriety: MNRIF and SHALF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNRIF: 100% vs. SHALF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MNRIF: $4.62B vs. SHALF: $3.03B
MNRIF [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $4.62B. SHALF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $3.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $72.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $8.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNRIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHALF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNRIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHALF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHALF is a better buy in the long-term than MNRIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHALF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SHALF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

MNRIF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHALF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +4.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+4.08% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNRIF($4.62B) has a higher market cap than SHALF($3.03B). SHALF YTD gains are higher at: 7.209 vs. MNRIF (-0.683). MNRIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 42.1B vs. SHALF (41.8M). MNRIF has more cash in the bank: 21.6B vs. SHALF (780M). SHALF has less debt than MNRIF: SHALF (6.18B) vs MNRIF (208B). MNRIF has higher revenues than SHALF: MNRIF (139B) vs SHALF (1.46B).
MNRIFSHALFMNRIF / SHALF
Capitalization4.62B3.03B153%
EBITDA42.1B41.8M100,718%
Gain YTD-0.6837.209-9%
P/E Ratio22.57N/A-
Revenue139B1.46B9,508%
Total Cash21.6B780M2,769%
Total Debt208B6.18B3,368%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNRIF vs SHALF: Fundamental Ratings
MNRIF
SHALF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6324
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNRIF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (35). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

MNRIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (100). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

MNRIF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (97). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

SHALF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as MNRIF (69). This means that SHALF’s stock grew similarly to MNRIF’s over the last 12 months.

SHALF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRIF (63). This means that SHALF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNRIFSHALF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SHALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCBAX14.610.02
+0.14%
BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Inv A
PGJQX16.85N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure R6
PCLVX20.50N/A
N/A
PACE Large Co Value Equity P
FNKLX15.37-0.34
-2.16%
Fidelity Series Value Discovery
NWHYX15.57-0.53
-3.29%
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Gr Instl Svc

MNRIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNRIF and MNOIY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNRIF and MNOIY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNRIF
1D Price
Change %
MNRIF100%
N/A
MNOIY - MNRIF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBDY - MNRIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
SKTP - MNRIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMIZF - MNRIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHALY - MNRIF
0%
Poorly correlated
-8.15%
More

SHALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHALF and WTBDY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHALF and WTBDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHALF
1D Price
Change %
SHALF100%
N/A
WTBDY - SHALF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
SKTP - SHALF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHCO - SHALF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.77%
PRSI - SHALF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNRIF - SHALF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More