MNRIF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.52 (-64.20%)
Updated
Jan 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.62B
WTBDY
Price
$9.59
Change
-$0.31 (-3.13%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.85B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNRIF vs WTBDY

Header iconMNRIF vs WTBDY Comparison
Open Charts MNRIF vs WTBDYBanner chart's image
Minor International Public
Price$0.29
Change-$0.52 (-64.20%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization4.62B
Whitbread
Price$9.59
Change-$0.31 (-3.13%)
Volume$1.49K
Capitalization8.85B
MNRIF vs WTBDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
WTBDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNRIF vs. WTBDY commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNRIF is a Hold and WTBDY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MNRIF: $0.29 vs. WTBDY: $9.59)
Brand notoriety: MNRIF and WTBDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNRIF: 100% vs. WTBDY: 6%
Market capitalization -- MNRIF: $4.62B vs. WTBDY: $8.85B
MNRIF [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $4.62B. WTBDY’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $8.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $72.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $9.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNRIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWTBDY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNRIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WTBDY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WTBDY is a better buy in the long-term than MNRIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WTBDY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WTBDY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MNRIF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WTBDY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -1.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

WTBDY is expected to report earnings on May 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.52% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTBDY($8.85B) has a higher market cap than MNRIF($4.62B). WTBDY has higher P/E ratio than MNRIF: WTBDY (25.45) vs MNRIF (22.57). WTBDY YTD gains are higher at: 5.321 vs. MNRIF (-64.698). MNRIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 42.1B vs. WTBDY (886M). MNRIF has higher revenues than WTBDY: MNRIF (139B) vs WTBDY (2.63B).
MNRIFWTBDYMNRIF / WTBDY
Capitalization4.62B8.85B52%
EBITDA42.1B886M4,752%
Gain YTD-64.6985.321-1,216%
P/E Ratio22.5725.4589%
Revenue139B2.63B5,295%
Total Cash21.6BN/A-
Total Debt208BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNRIF vs WTBDY: Fundamental Ratings
MNRIF
WTBDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3824
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10059
SMR RATING
1..100
7296
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10041
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNRIF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WTBDY (79). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew significantly faster than WTBDY’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRIF (100). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRIF’s over the last 12 months.

MNRIF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBDY (96). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew similarly to WTBDY’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRIF (86). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRIF’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRIF (100). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WTBDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WTBDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUHCX21.48N/A
N/A
DWS Health and Wellness C
FBSAX36.92N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Adv
AUERX13.56N/A
N/A
Auer Growth
PGELX26.37N/A
N/A
George Putnam Balanced R5
SSSYX447.98N/A
N/A
State Street Equity 500 Index K

MNRIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNRIF and MNOIY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNRIF and MNOIY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNRIF
1D Price
Change %
MNRIF100%
N/A
MNOIY - MNRIF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBDY - MNRIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.08%
SKTP - MNRIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMIZF - MNRIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHALY - MNRIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WTBDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTBDY has been loosely correlated with ACCYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTBDY jumps, then ACCYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTBDY
1D Price
Change %
WTBDY100%
-3.08%
ACCYY - WTBDY
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
IHG - WTBDY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
HTHT - WTBDY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
H - WTBDY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
NHHEF - WTBDY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More