MNSAF
Price
$2.35
Change
+$0.07 (+3.07%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
683.03M
WGLIF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
14.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNSAF vs WGLIF

Header iconMNSAF vs WGLIF Comparison
Open Charts MNSAF vs WGLIFBanner chart's image
MINEROS SA
Price$2.35
Change+$0.07 (+3.07%)
Volume$16.33K
Capitalization683.03M
Westward Gold
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$117.96K
Capitalization14.48M
MNSAF vs WGLIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WGLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNSAF vs. WGLIF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNSAF is a Buy and WGLIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MNSAF: $2.35 vs. WGLIF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: MNSAF and WGLIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNSAF: 3% vs. WGLIF: 68%
Market capitalization -- MNSAF: $683.03M vs. WGLIF: $14.48M
MNSAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $683.03M. WGLIF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $14.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNSAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWGLIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNSAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WGLIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNSAF is a better buy in the long-term than WGLIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNSAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WGLIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNSAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WGLIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNSAF is a better buy in the short-term than WGLIF.

Price Growth

MNSAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +15.31% price change this week, while WGLIF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4218.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNSAF($683M) has a higher market cap than WGLIF($14.5M). MNSAF YTD gains are higher at: 124.915 vs. WGLIF (53.704). MNSAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 209M vs. WGLIF (-1.29M). MNSAF has more cash in the bank: 110M vs. WGLIF (923K). MNSAF has higher revenues than WGLIF: MNSAF (634M) vs WGLIF (0).
MNSAFWGLIFMNSAF / WGLIF
Capitalization683M14.5M4,710%
EBITDA209M-1.29M-16,168%
Gain YTD124.91553.704233%
P/E Ratio5.34N/A-
Revenue634M0-
Total Cash110M923K11,918%
Total Debt25.6MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSAFWGLIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
8%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WGLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KORE2.380.03
+1.28%
KORE Group Holdings
DCOM30.60-0.08
-0.26%
Dime Community Bancshares
OCFT7.23-0.02
-0.28%
OneConnect Financial Technology Co Ltd
TAL10.79-0.09
-0.83%
TAL Education Group
UBER95.33-1.20
-1.24%
Uber Technologies

MNSAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNSAF and KLGDF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNSAF and KLGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSAF
1D Price
Change %
MNSAF100%
+3.04%
KLGDF - MNSAF
31%
Poorly correlated
+11.41%
TDRRF - MNSAF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
RDYFF - MNSAF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGMCF - MNSAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFLDF - MNSAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More

WGLIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WGLIF and AUGO have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WGLIF and AUGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WGLIF
1D Price
Change %
WGLIF100%
-1.19%
AUGO - WGLIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
GGAZF - WGLIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
MNSAF - WGLIF
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
MNMRF - WGLIF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
VTXXF - WGLIF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More