MNSAF
Price
$1.84
Change
-$0.07 (-3.66%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
142.57M
WGLIF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
6.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNSAF vs WGLIF

Header iconMNSAF vs WGLIF Comparison
Open Charts MNSAF vs WGLIFBanner chart's image
MINEROS SA
Price$1.84
Change-$0.07 (-3.66%)
Volume$7.35K
Capitalization142.57M
Westward Gold
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$156.8K
Capitalization6.55M
MNSAF vs WGLIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WGLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNSAF vs. WGLIF commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNSAF is a Hold and WGLIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MNSAF: $1.84 vs. WGLIF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: MNSAF and WGLIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNSAF: 66% vs. WGLIF: 116%
Market capitalization -- MNSAF: $142.57M vs. WGLIF: $6.55M
MNSAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $142.57M. WGLIF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNSAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWGLIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNSAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WGLIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNSAF is a better buy in the long-term than WGLIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNSAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WGLIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNSAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • WGLIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNSAF is a better buy in the short-term than WGLIF.

Price Growth

MNSAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.33% price change this week, while WGLIF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.55% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNSAF($143M) has a higher market cap than WGLIF($6.55M). MNSAF YTD gains are higher at: 76.103 vs. WGLIF (72.130). MNSAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 62.5M vs. WGLIF (-1.31M). WGLIF has more cash in the bank: 571K vs. MNSAF (170K). MNSAF has higher revenues than WGLIF: MNSAF (522M) vs WGLIF (0).
MNSAFWGLIFMNSAF / WGLIF
Capitalization143M6.55M2,184%
EBITDA62.5M-1.31M-4,765%
Gain YTD76.10372.130106%
P/E Ratio14.58N/A-
Revenue522M0-
Total Cash170K571K30%
Total Debt46.9MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSAFWGLIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WGLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GPMT2.720.17
+6.67%
Granite Point Mortgage Trust
CLSK11.000.17
+1.57%
CleanSpark
MMM150.820.73
+0.49%
3M Company
MAG21.680.02
+0.09%
MAG Silver Corp
SOHO0.82-0.02
-2.85%
Sotherly Hotels

MNSAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSAF has been loosely correlated with PPTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSAF jumps, then PPTA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSAF
1D Price
Change %
MNSAF100%
N/A
PPTA - MNSAF
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.48%
GNYPF - MNSAF
31%
Poorly correlated
-25.00%
KLGDF - MNSAF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
TDRRF - MNSAF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
RDYFF - MNSAF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WGLIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WGLIF and FNLPF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WGLIF and FNLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WGLIF
1D Price
Change %
WGLIF100%
-4.67%
FNLPF - WGLIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+10.01%
IMPUY - WGLIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUGO - WGLIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
GGAZF - WGLIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
MNSAF - WGLIF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More