MNSB
Price
$18.68
Change
+$0.18 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
136.83M
39 days until earnings call
SBCF
Price
$27.15
Change
+$0.47 (+1.76%)
Updated
Jun 27, 11:49 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.1B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNSB vs SBCF

Header iconMNSB vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts MNSB vs SBCFBanner chart's image
MainStreet Bancshares
Price$18.68
Change+$0.18 (+0.97%)
Volume$17.63K
Capitalization136.83M
Seacoast Banking
Price$27.15
Change+$0.47 (+1.76%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization2.1B
MNSB vs SBCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNSB vs. SBCF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNSB is a StrongBuy and SBCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MNSB: $18.68 vs. SBCF: $26.68)
Brand notoriety: MNSB and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNSB: 65% vs. SBCF: 130%
Market capitalization -- MNSB: $136.83M vs. SBCF: $2.1B
MNSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $136.83M. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNSB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNSB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the long-term than MNSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNSB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNSB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNSB is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

MNSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.47% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNSB is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.47% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF($2.1B) has a higher market cap than MNSB($137M). SBCF has higher P/E ratio than MNSB: SBCF (20.13) vs MNSB (5.53). MNSB YTD gains are higher at: 4.382 vs. SBCF (-1.711). MNSB has less debt than SBCF: MNSB (72.6M) vs SBCF (156M). SBCF has higher revenues than MNSB: SBCF (567M) vs MNSB (79.6M).
MNSBSBCFMNSB / SBCF
Capitalization137M2.1B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.382-1.711-256%
P/E Ratio5.5320.1327%
Revenue79.6M567M14%
Total CashN/A168M-
Total Debt72.6M156M47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNSB vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
MNSB
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
517
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6469
SMR RATING
1..100
8214
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
642
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNSB's Valuation (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (62). This means that MNSB’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

MNSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (69). This means that MNSB’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNSB (82). This means that SBCF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (54). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

MNSB's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (42). This means that MNSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSBSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MKGCX28.620.26
+0.92%
BlackRock Advantage Global K
PGSVX13.06N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Global Value A
ARABX13.94N/A
N/A
Aristotle Small Cap Eq A
JNUSX17.38N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Developed International Value L
FCDTX33.34N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp M

MNSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSB has been loosely correlated with OBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSB jumps, then OBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSB
1D Price
Change %
MNSB100%
+0.97%
OBT - MNSB
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
SBCF - MNSB
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
CATY - MNSB
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
VLY - MNSB
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
VBTX - MNSB
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
More