MNSBP
Price
$24.78
Change
+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SBCF
Price
$28.76
Change
-$0.05 (-0.17%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.1B
89 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNSBP vs SBCF

Header iconMNSBP vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts MNSBP vs SBCFBanner chart's image
MainStreet Bancshares
Price$24.78
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Volume$3.3K
CapitalizationN/A
Seacoast Banking
Price$28.76
Change-$0.05 (-0.17%)
Volume$890.96K
Capitalization2.1B
MNSBP vs SBCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNSBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNSBP vs. SBCF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNSBP is a Hold and SBCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MNSBP: $24.78 vs. SBCF: $28.76)
Brand notoriety: MNSBP and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNSBP: 87% vs. SBCF: 141%
Market capitalization -- MNSBP: $0 vs. SBCF: $2.1B
MNSBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNSBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNSBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the long-term than MNSBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNSBP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNSBP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNSBP is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

MNSBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.88% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.50% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNSBP YTD gains are higher at: 6.532 vs. SBCF (5.952). MNSBP has less debt than SBCF: MNSBP (72.6M) vs SBCF (156M). SBCF has higher revenues than MNSBP: SBCF (567M) vs MNSBP (79.6M).
MNSBPSBCFMNSBP / SBCF
CapitalizationN/A2.1B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.5325.952110%
P/E RatioN/A20.13-
Revenue79.6M567M14%
Total CashN/A168M-
Total Debt72.6M156M47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSBPSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNSBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLYCX37.10N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Select C
PCVCX9.46N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Small-Cap Value C
IVFCX4.27N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Intl Strat Val Div C
LCMMX79.37N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth O
MGLLX16.62-0.04
-0.24%
MFS Global Real Estate R3

MNSBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSBP has been loosely correlated with FFWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSBP jumps, then FFWM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSBP
1D Price
Change %
MNSBP100%
+0.20%
FFWM - MNSBP
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
SBCF - MNSBP
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
MCB - MNSBP
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
ONBPO - MNSBP
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
WAL - MNSBP
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
More

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
-0.17%
ABCB - SBCF
93%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
TRMK - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
UCB - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
WSFS - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
UBSI - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
More