MNTR
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
504.71K
SLNH
Price
$0.50
Change
+$0.03 (+6.38%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
7.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNTR vs SLNH

Header iconMNTR vs SLNH Comparison
Open Charts MNTR vs SLNHBanner chart's image
Mentor Capital
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$73.91K
Capitalization504.71K
Soluna Holdings
Price$0.50
Change+$0.03 (+6.38%)
Volume$1.79M
Capitalization7.66M
MNTR vs SLNH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNTR vs. SLNH commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNTR is a StrongBuy and SLNH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MNTR: $0.05 vs. SLNH: $0.50)
Brand notoriety: MNTR and SLNH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNTR: 366% vs. SLNH: 77%
Market capitalization -- MNTR: $504.71K vs. SLNH: $7.66M
MNTR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $504.71K. SLNH’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNTR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLNH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNTR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLNH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNTR is a better buy in the long-term than SLNH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNTR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLNH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNTR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SLNH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNTR is a better buy in the short-term than SLNH.

Price Growth

MNTR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +8.37% price change this week, while SLNH (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +9.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.99% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLNH($7.66M) has a higher market cap than MNTR($505K). MNTR YTD gains are higher at: -34.090 vs. SLNH (-76.195). MNTR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 135K vs. SLNH (-33.05M). SLNH has more cash in the bank: 5.63M vs. MNTR (863K). MNTR has less debt than SLNH: MNTR (1.71M) vs SLNH (21.4M). SLNH has higher revenues than MNTR: SLNH (15.1M) vs MNTR (8.03M).
MNTRSLNHMNTR / SLNH
Capitalization505K7.66M7%
EBITDA135K-33.05M-0%
Gain YTD-34.090-76.19545%
P/E Ratio11.74N/A-
Revenue8.03M15.1M53%
Total Cash863K5.63M15%
Total Debt1.71M21.4M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNTR vs SLNH: Fundamental Ratings
MNTR
SLNH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6667
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5497
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLNH's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTR (100). This means that SLNH’s stock grew similarly to MNTR’s over the last 12 months.

SLNH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTR (100). This means that SLNH’s stock grew similarly to MNTR’s over the last 12 months.

MNTR's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNH (100). This means that MNTR’s stock grew similarly to SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

MNTR's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLNH (97). This means that MNTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

SLNH's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNTR (50). This means that SLNH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNTR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNTRSLNH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NA4.58-0.01
-0.22%
Nano Labs Ltd
TRMB82.52-0.18
-0.22%
Trimble
HIHO1.61N/A
-0.31%
Highway Holdings Limited
NAMS22.96-0.66
-2.79%
NewAmsterdam Pharma Company NV
MAZE13.32-0.93
-6.53%
Maze Therapeutics Inc

MNTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNTR and MNXBF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNTR and MNXBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNTR
1D Price
Change %
MNTR100%
-0.08%
MNXBF - MNTR
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERNXY - MNTR
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIGI - MNTR
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.00%
SLNH - MNTR
5%
Poorly correlated
+7.04%
MFH - MNTR
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.10%
More

SLNH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLNH has been loosely correlated with BITF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLNH jumps, then BITF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLNH
1D Price
Change %
SLNH100%
+7.04%
BITF - SLNH
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
HIVE - SLNH
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
MARA - SLNH
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
HUT - SLNH
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.24%
RIOT - SLNH
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
More