Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNWBX vs NLSIX
MNWBX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MNWBX vs NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.84B
MNWBX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNWBX vs. NLSIX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNWBX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.84B vs. MNWBX (37.2M). MNWBX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MNWBX (0.06) vs NLSIX (0.02). MNWBX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MNWBX (11 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MNWBX (2.66) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MNWBX (11.00). MNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MNWBX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. MNWBX (3.36). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.90 vs. MNWBX (11.43).
| MNWBX | NLSIX | MNWBX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.32 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.66 | 1.32 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.551 | 6.667 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.2M | 7.84B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.02 | 314% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | 7.67 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.81 | 24.59 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.43 | 23.90 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.84 | 59.44 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers