Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNWBX vs NLSIX
MNWBX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MNWBX vs NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.50
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.44B
MNWBX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNWBX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNWBX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.45B vs. MNWBX (35.9M). MNWBX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MNWBX (0.06) vs NLSIX (0.02). MNWBX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MNWBX (11 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MNWBX (2.54) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MNWBX (6.00). MNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MNWBX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. MNWBX (5.53). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.06 vs. MNWBX (11.42).
| MNWBX | NLSIX | MNWBX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.32 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.54 | 1.32 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.635 | 4.000 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.9M | 7.45B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.02 | 307% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.53 | 8.24 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.24 | 19.42 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.42 | 29.06 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.34 | 50.85 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement