Ad is loading...
MNWCX vs NLSAX
MNWCX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts MNWCX vs NLSAX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.60
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.22B
MNWCX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNWCX vs. NLSAX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNWCX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.22B vs. MNWCX (34.1M). MNWCX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: MNWCX (0.09) vs NLSAX (0.00). MNWCX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: MNWCX (11 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). MNWCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MNWCX (6.00). MNWCX (1000) and NLSAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. MNWCX (4.15). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.16 vs. MNWCX (8.25).
| MNWCX | NLSAX | MNWCX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.68 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.54 | 1.68 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.946 | 0.758 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1M | 7.22B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.15 | 6.41 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.24 | 12.79 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.25 | 30.16 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.63 | 39.56 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers