Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNWCX vs NLSAX
MNWCX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts MNWCX vs NLSAX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
MNWCX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNWCX vs. NLSAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNWCX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8.01B vs. MNWCX (37.5M). MNWCX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: MNWCX (0.08) vs NLSAX (0.00). MNWCX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: MNWCX (11 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). MNWCX (2.66) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MNWCX (11.00). MNWCX (1000) and NLSAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.32 vs. MNWCX (3.61). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.25 vs. MNWCX (11.35).
| MNWCX | NLSAX | MNWCX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.68 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.66 | 1.68 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.484 | 6.392 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.5M | 8.01B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | 7.32 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.41 | 20.32 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.35 | 20.25 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.73 | 55.52 | 41% |