Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNWCX vs NLSAX
MNWCX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts MNWCX vs NLSAX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.93
Change-$0.13 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32B
MNWCX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNWCX vs. NLSAX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNWCX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. MNWCX (35M). MNWCX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: MNWCX (0.08) vs NLSAX (0.00). MNWCX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: MNWCX (11 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). MNWCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MNWCX (6.00). MNWCX (1000) and NLSAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. MNWCX (4.74). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.60 vs. MNWCX (11.23).
| MNWCX | NLSAX | MNWCX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.68 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.54 | 1.68 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.653 | 2.546 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35M | 7.32B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.74 | 7.13 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.46 | 18.49 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.23 | 27.60 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.05 | 43.02 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers