Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNWCX vs NLSIX
MNWCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MNWCX vs NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.38
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.36B
MNWCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNWCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNWCX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.36B vs. MNWCX (35M). MNWCX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MNWCX (0.08) vs NLSIX (0.02). MNWCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MNWCX (11 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). MNWCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MNWCX (6.00). MNWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MNWCX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.91 vs. MNWCX (5.02). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 30.25 vs. MNWCX (10.66).
| MNWCX | NLSIX | MNWCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.32 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.54 | 1.32 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.399 | 3.253 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35M | 7.36B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.02 | 393% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.02 | 8.91 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.10 | 16.19 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.66 | 30.25 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.87 | 48.97 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement