Ad is loading...
MNWCX vs NLSIX
MNWCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MNWCX vs NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.16
Change-$0.38 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
MNWCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNWCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNWCX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.01B vs. MNWCX (33.2M). MNWCX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MNWCX (0.09) vs NLSIX (0.02). MNWCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MNWCX (11 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). MNWCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MNWCX (6.00). MNWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MNWCX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.45 vs. MNWCX (0.86). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 34.06 vs. MNWCX (7.79).
| MNWCX | NLSIX | MNWCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.32 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.54 | 1.32 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.677 | -3.147 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.2M | 7.01B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.02 | 389% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.86 | 2.45 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.30 | 5.92 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.79 | 34.06 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.66 | 39.95 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers