Ad is loading...
MNWCX vs NLSIX
MNWCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MNWCX vs NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.22B
MNWCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNWCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNWCX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.22B vs. MNWCX (34.1M). MNWCX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MNWCX (0.09) vs NLSIX (0.02). MNWCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MNWCX (11 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). MNWCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MNWCX (6.00). MNWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MNWCX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.80 vs. MNWCX (4.15). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.75 vs. MNWCX (8.25).
| MNWCX | NLSIX | MNWCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.32 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.54 | 1.32 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.946 | 0.853 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1M | 7.22B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.02 | 389% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.15 | 6.80 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.24 | 14.16 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.25 | 32.75 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.63 | 44.96 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...