Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNWCX vs NLSIX
MNWCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MNWCX vs NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.81B
MNWCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNWCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNWCX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.81B vs. MNWCX (37.2M). MNWCX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MNWCX (0.08) vs NLSIX (0.02). MNWCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MNWCX (11 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MNWCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MNWCX (11.00). MNWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MNWCX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.66 vs. MNWCX (4.17). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 26.74 vs. MNWCX (11.98).
| MNWCX | NLSIX | MNWCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.32 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.54 | 1.32 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.838 | 6.720 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.2M | 7.81B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.02 | 398% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.17 | 8.66 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.36 | 24.65 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.98 | 26.74 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.79 | 65.22 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement