MOAEF vs MOGLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MOAEF is a Hold and MOGLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MOAEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMOGLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MOAEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MOGLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MOAEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOGLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MOAEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MOGLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MOAEF (@Coal) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MOGLF (@Coal) price change was -2.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.50%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Coal (+1.26% weekly)Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
| MOAEF | MOGLF | MOAEF / MOGLF | |
| Capitalization | 17.4M | 322M | 5% |
| EBITDA | -770.25M | 35.9M | -2,146% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -8.867 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 0.12 | 4.93 | 2% |
| Revenue | 2.91B | 184M | 1,579% |
| Total Cash | 112M | 25.9M | 432% |
| Total Debt | 5.97B | 453M | 1,318% |
MOAEF | MOGLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MOAEF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MOGLF (59). This means that MOAEF’s stock grew similarly to MOGLF’s over the last 12 months.
MOGLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOAEF (100). This means that MOGLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOAEF’s over the last 12 months.
MOGLF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MOAEF (100). This means that MOGLF’s stock grew similarly to MOAEF’s over the last 12 months.
MOAEF's Price Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as MOGLF (86). This means that MOAEF’s stock grew similarly to MOGLF’s over the last 12 months.
MOAEF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as MOGLF (67). This means that MOAEF’s stock grew similarly to MOGLF’s over the last 12 months.
| MOAEF | MOGLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 31% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 14% | 12 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 43% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 27% | 12 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 21% | 12 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 35% | 12 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 40% | 12 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 28% | 12 days ago 73% |
MOAEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MOAEF and PTIZF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MOAEF and PTIZF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOAEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOAEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PTIZF - MOAEF | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.55% | ||
| MOGLF - MOAEF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NHPEF - MOAEF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| GCLMF - MOAEF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MOAEY - MOAEF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MOGLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MOGLF and CSUAY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MOGLF and CSUAY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOGLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOGLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CSUAY - MOGLF | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
| CCOZY - MOGLF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MOAEF - MOGLF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CUAEF - MOGLF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ITAYY - MOGLF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||