It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MODG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNMSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MODG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNMSF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
MODG (@Recreational Products) experienced а +5.06% price change this week, while SNMSF (@Recreational Products) price change was -2.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +2.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.27%.
MODG is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.
SNMSF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
MODG | SNMSF | MODG / SNMSF | |
Capitalization | 1.8B | 1.66B | 108% |
EBITDA | -985.2M | 299M | -329% |
Gain YTD | 24.173 | -28.879 | -84% |
P/E Ratio | 76.36 | 19.66 | 388% |
Revenue | 4.14B | 2.3B | 180% |
Total Cash | 684M | 120M | 570% |
Total Debt | 2.9B | 532M | 545% |
MODG | SNMSF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SNMSF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MODG (79) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that SNMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MODG’s over the last 12 months.
SNMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MODG (100) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that SNMSF’s stock grew similarly to MODG’s over the last 12 months.
SNMSF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as MODG (100) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that SNMSF’s stock grew similarly to MODG’s over the last 12 months.
MODG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNMSF (81) in the null industry. This means that MODG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNMSF’s over the last 12 months.
SNMSF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as MODG (100) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that SNMSF’s stock grew similarly to MODG’s over the last 12 months.
MODG | SNMSF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago57% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 2 days ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 2 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 2 days ago51% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 2 days ago55% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago67% | 14 days ago56% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 2 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 2 days ago57% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 2 days ago57% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNMSF and OSW have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNMSF and OSW's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNMSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SNMSF | 100% | -2.15% | ||
OSW - SNMSF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
MODG - SNMSF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
GOLF - SNMSF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.82% | ||
SHMDF - SNMSF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SMNNY - SNMSF | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
More |