MOFG
Price
$30.18
Change
-$0.06 (-0.20%)
Updated
Aug 28, 11:24 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
626.16M
56 days until earnings call
SBCF
Price
$31.07
Change
-$0.12 (-0.38%)
Updated
Aug 28, 11:39 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.74B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MOFG vs SBCF

Header iconMOFG vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts MOFG vs SBCFBanner chart's image
MidWestOne Financial Gp
Price$30.18
Change-$0.06 (-0.20%)
Volume$100
Capitalization626.16M
Seacoast Banking
Price$31.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.38%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.74B
MOFG vs SBCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MOFG vs. SBCF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MOFG is a StrongBuy and SBCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MOFG: $30.23 vs. SBCF: $31.19)
Brand notoriety: MOFG and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MOFG: 61% vs. SBCF: 66%
Market capitalization -- MOFG: $626.16M vs. SBCF: $2.74B
MOFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $626.16M. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MOFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MOFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the long-term than MOFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MOFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MOFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOFG is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

MOFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.81% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

MOFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF($2.74B) has a higher market cap than MOFG($626M). SBCF has higher P/E ratio than MOFG: SBCF (19.13) vs MOFG (14.48). SBCF YTD gains are higher at: 14.904 vs. MOFG (5.535). SBCF has more cash in the bank: 191M vs. MOFG (68.5M). MOFG has less debt than SBCF: MOFG (112M) vs SBCF (822M). SBCF has higher revenues than MOFG: SBCF (555M) vs MOFG (84.7M).
MOFGSBCFMOFG / SBCF
Capitalization626M2.74B23%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.53514.90437%
P/E Ratio14.4819.1376%
Revenue84.7M555M15%
Total Cash68.5M191M36%
Total Debt112M822M14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MOFG vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
MOFG
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1111
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4454
SMR RATING
1..100
6718
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5032

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBCF's Valuation (73) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (91). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (54). This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOFG (67). This means that SBCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (51). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (53). This means that MOFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MOFGSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSACX19.86N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq I
RYLVX114.07N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value A
WSCGX35.86N/A
N/A
Allspring Small Company Growth Inst
SVBCX30.74N/A
N/A
JHancock Balanced C
JSCHX33.91N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend R6

MOFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOFG has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOFG jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOFG
1D Price
Change %
MOFG100%
-0.03%
FMBH - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
STBA - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
UBSI - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
SRCE - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
SBCF - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
More

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
+0.74%
UCB - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
EFSC - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
UBSI - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
ABCB - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
WSFS - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
More