MOFG
Price
$31.58
Change
-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jan 31, 04:46 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
369.19M
83 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$22.70
Change
-$0.07 (-0.31%)
Updated
Jan 31, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.42B
88 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MOFG vs SFNC

Header iconMOFG vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts MOFG vs SFNCBanner chart's image
MidWestOne Financial Gp
Price$31.58
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Volume$200
Capitalization369.19M
Simmons First National
Price$22.70
Change-$0.07 (-0.31%)
Volume$1.84K
Capitalization2.42B
MOFG vs SFNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MOFG vs. SFNC commentary
Feb 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MOFG is a StrongBuy and SFNC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 01, 2025
Stock price -- (MOFG: $31.60 vs. SFNC: $22.77)
Brand notoriety: MOFG and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MOFG: 45% vs. SFNC: 75%
Market capitalization -- MOFG: $369.19M vs. SFNC: $2.42B
MOFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $369.19M. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MOFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MOFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFNC is a better buy in the long-term than MOFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MOFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MOFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFNC is a better buy in the short-term than MOFG.

Price Growth

MOFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.67% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

MOFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($2.42B) has a higher market cap than MOFG($369M). MOFG has higher P/E ratio than SFNC: MOFG (17.17) vs SFNC (13.98). MOFG YTD gains are higher at: 8.516 vs. SFNC (2.660). SFNC has more cash in the bank: 345M vs. MOFG (71M). MOFG has less debt than SFNC: MOFG (418M) vs SFNC (1.34B). SFNC has higher revenues than MOFG: SFNC (782M) vs MOFG (163M).
MOFGSFNCMOFG / SFNC
Capitalization369M2.42B15%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.5162.660320%
P/E Ratio17.1713.98123%
Revenue163M782M21%
Total Cash71M345M21%
Total Debt418M1.34B31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MOFG vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
MOFG
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2012
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8292
SMR RATING
1..100
5612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4349
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MOFG's Valuation (93) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (94) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (92) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's SMR Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOFG (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (49) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (8) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MOFGSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSCJX24.840.39
+1.60%
PGIM Jennison Small Company R4
BRSTX15.200.11
+0.73%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R3
VLISX577.01N/A
N/A
Vanguard Large Cap Index Institutional
PABFX17.85N/A
N/A
PGIM Balanced Z
GRETX11.58N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Inv

MOFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOFG has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOFG jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOFG
1D Price
Change %
MOFG100%
-0.03%
THFF - MOFG
85%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
FMBH - MOFG
84%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
NWBI - MOFG
84%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
SFNC - MOFG
84%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
HBNC - MOFG
83%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
More

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
+0.80%
UBSI - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
SBCF - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
NWBI - SFNC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
WSFS - SFNC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
UCB - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
More