MOFG
Price
$29.14
Change
+$0.61 (+2.14%)
Updated
Sep 17, 12:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
600.48M
36 days until earnings call
SRCE
Price
$63.94
Change
+$0.82 (+1.30%)
Updated
Sep 17, 01:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.55B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MOFG vs SRCE

Header iconMOFG vs SRCE Comparison
Open Charts MOFG vs SRCEBanner chart's image
MidWestOne Financial Gp
Price$29.14
Change+$0.61 (+2.14%)
Volume$200
Capitalization600.48M
1st Source
Price$63.94
Change+$0.82 (+1.30%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.55B
MOFG vs SRCE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MOFG vs. SRCE commentary
Sep 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MOFG is a Hold and SRCE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 17, 2025
Stock price -- (MOFG: $28.53 vs. SRCE: $63.12)
Brand notoriety: MOFG and SRCE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MOFG: 86% vs. SRCE: 96%
Market capitalization -- MOFG: $600.48M vs. SRCE: $1.55B
MOFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $600.48M. SRCE’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MOFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRCE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MOFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SRCE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRCE is a better buy in the long-term than MOFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MOFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRCE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MOFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SRCE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRCE is a better buy in the short-term than MOFG.

Price Growth

MOFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.99% price change this week, while SRCE (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

MOFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

SRCE is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRCE($1.55B) has a higher market cap than MOFG($600M). MOFG has higher P/E ratio than SRCE: MOFG (14.48) vs SRCE (11.07). SRCE YTD gains are higher at: 10.124 vs. MOFG (0.406). MOFG has less debt than SRCE: MOFG (112M) vs SRCE (152M). SRCE has higher revenues than MOFG: SRCE (408M) vs MOFG (84.7M).
MOFGSRCEMOFG / SRCE
Capitalization600M1.55B39%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.40610.1244%
P/E Ratio14.4811.07131%
Revenue84.7M408M21%
Total Cash78.7MN/A-
Total Debt112M152M74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MOFG vs SRCE: Fundamental Ratings
MOFG
SRCE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5569
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5223
SMR RATING
1..100
6820
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
952
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRCE's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOFG (91). This means that SRCE’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

SRCE's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (52). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

SRCE's SMR Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOFG (68). This means that SRCE’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

SRCE's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (54). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRCE (52). This means that MOFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRCE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MOFGSRCE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMLIX52.42N/A
N/A
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
RPGIX23.47N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Global Industrials
JVARX39.94N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Value Advantage R5
ARIBX15.36N/A
N/A
Aristotle Small Cap Eq I
RGESX11.60-0.01
-0.09%
Russell Inv Global Equity S

MOFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOFG has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOFG jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOFG
1D Price
Change %
MOFG100%
-1.62%
FMBH - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
SRCE - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
UBSI - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
THFF - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
BBT - MOFG
85%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
More