MOHCF
Price
$23.00
Change
-$1.45 (-5.93%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.07B
SPTJF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.02 (+13.33%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.4B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MOHCF vs SPTJF

Header iconMOHCF vs SPTJF Comparison
Open Charts MOHCF vs SPTJFBanner chart's image
Motor Oil (Hellas) Corinth Refineries S.A
Price$23.00
Change-$1.45 (-5.93%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.07B
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical
Price$0.17
Change+$0.02 (+13.33%)
Volume$23.7K
Capitalization3.4B
MOHCF vs SPTJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SPTJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MOHCF vs. SPTJF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MOHCF is a Buy and SPTJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MOHCF: $23.00 vs. SPTJF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: MOHCF and SPTJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MOHCF: 100% vs. SPTJF: 44%
Market capitalization -- MOHCF: $3.07B vs. SPTJF: $3.4B
MOHCF [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $3.07B. SPTJF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $3.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $54.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $7.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MOHCF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSPTJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MOHCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SPTJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MOHCF is a better buy in the long-term than SPTJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SPTJF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SPTJF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

MOHCF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SPTJF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +9.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+1.11% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPTJF($3.4B) has a higher market cap than MOHCF($3.07B). SPTJF has higher P/E ratio than MOHCF: SPTJF (71.98) vs MOHCF (7.86). SPTJF YTD gains are higher at: 15.824 vs. MOHCF (0.000). MOHCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 893M vs. SPTJF (352M). SPTJF has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. MOHCF (1.08B). SPTJF has less debt than MOHCF: SPTJF (196M) vs MOHCF (3.14B). SPTJF has higher revenues than MOHCF: SPTJF (85.4B) vs MOHCF (11.9B).
MOHCFSPTJFMOHCF / SPTJF
Capitalization3.07B3.4B90%
EBITDA893M352M254%
Gain YTD0.00015.824-
P/E Ratio7.8671.9811%
Revenue11.9B85.4B14%
Total Cash1.08B12B9%
Total Debt3.14B196M1,604%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPTJF: Fundamental Ratings
SPTJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MOHCFSPTJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPTJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBMAX29.540.49
+1.69%
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr A
ARTJX19.790.25
+1.28%
Artisan International Small-Mid Investor
RNGCX67.760.51
+0.76%
American Funds New Economy R3
MSGRX13.27N/A
N/A
Meridian Small Cap Growth Institutional
SBRAX20.56N/A
N/A
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Ret

MOHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOHCF has been loosely correlated with DKL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOHCF jumps, then DKL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOHCF
1D Price
Change %
MOHCF100%
N/A
DKL - MOHCF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
CTXAY - MOHCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
CSAN - MOHCF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
FGPR - MOHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
NTOIY - MOHCF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
More

SPTJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPTJF and NZRFF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPTJF and NZRFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPTJF
1D Price
Change %
SPTJF100%
N/A
NZRFF - SPTJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTXAF - SPTJF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTOIF - SPTJF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOHCF - SPTJF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKIUF - SPTJF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
More