MONDY
Price
$27.41
Change
+$0.28 (+1.03%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.99B
POELF
Price
$4.00
Change
-$0.20 (-4.76%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.74B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MONDY vs POELF

Header iconMONDY vs POELF Comparison
Open Charts MONDY vs POELFBanner chart's image
Mondi
Price$27.41
Change+$0.28 (+1.03%)
Volume$16.47K
Capitalization5.99B
Portucel-Empresa Produtora de Pasta e Papel S.A
Price$4.00
Change-$0.20 (-4.76%)
Volume$2.48K
Capitalization2.74B
MONDY vs POELF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MONDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MONDY vs. POELF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MONDY is a Hold and POELF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MONDY: $27.41 vs. POELF: $4.00)
Brand notoriety: MONDY and POELF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MONDY: 193% vs. POELF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MONDY: $5.99B vs. POELF: $2.74B
MONDY [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $5.99B. POELF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $2.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MONDY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePOELF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MONDY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • POELF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, POELF is a better buy in the long-term than MONDY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MONDY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MONDY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MONDY (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -2.52% price change this week, while POELF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.56% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MONDY($5.99B) has a higher market cap than POELF($2.75B). MONDY has higher P/E ratio than POELF: MONDY (27.21) vs POELF (9.01). POELF YTD gains are higher at: 2.564 vs. MONDY (-1.696). MONDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 982M vs. POELF (564M). MONDY has higher revenues than POELF: MONDY (7.59B) vs POELF (2.09B).
MONDYPOELFMONDY / POELF
Capitalization5.99B2.75B218%
EBITDA982M564M174%
Gain YTD-1.6962.564-66%
P/E Ratio27.219.01302%
Revenue7.59B2.09B363%
Total CashN/A287M-
Total DebtN/A1.02B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MONDY vs POELF: Fundamental Ratings
MONDY
POELF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6246
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10028
SMR RATING
1..100
9442
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1956
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

POELF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as MONDY (10). This means that POELF’s stock grew similarly to MONDY’s over the last 12 months.

POELF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MONDY (100). This means that POELF’s stock grew significantly faster than MONDY’s over the last 12 months.

POELF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MONDY (94). This means that POELF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MONDY’s over the last 12 months.

POELF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as MONDY (81). This means that POELF’s stock grew similarly to MONDY’s over the last 12 months.

MONDY's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POELF (56). This means that MONDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than POELF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MONDYPOELF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MONDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIIFX31.75N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer International Equ A
FINSX50.16N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor New Insights I
PJDAX18.69N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend A
MMOJX9.78N/A
N/A
MassMutual Overseas Y
LGMNX26.59N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation N

MONDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MONDY has been loosely correlated with SEOAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MONDY jumps, then SEOAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MONDY
1D Price
Change %
MONDY100%
+1.03%
SEOAY - MONDY
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
UPMMY - MONDY
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
MERC - MONDY
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
MAGN - MONDY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
CLW - MONDY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
More

POELF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that POELF and MNODF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that POELF and MNODF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POELF
1D Price
Change %
POELF100%
N/A
MNODF - POELF
30%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
MONDY - POELF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
OJIPY - POELF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDGPY - POELF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMPMY - POELF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More