MONOF
Price
$16.35
Change
-$0.72 (-4.22%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
7.48B
SBDS
Price
$13.74
Change
-$0.26 (-1.86%)
Updated
Sep 26, 10:37 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MONOF vs SBDS

Header iconMONOF vs SBDS Comparison
Open Charts MONOF vs SBDSBanner chart's image
Monotaro
Price$16.35
Change-$0.72 (-4.22%)
Volume$13.8K
Capitalization7.48B
Solo Brands
Price$13.74
Change-$0.26 (-1.86%)
Volume$200
Capitalization23.06M
MONOF vs SBDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MONOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MONOF vs. SBDS commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MONOF is a Hold and SBDS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MONOF: $16.35 vs. SBDS: $14.00)
Brand notoriety: MONOF and SBDS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MONOF: 493% vs. SBDS: 18%
Market capitalization -- MONOF: $7.48B vs. SBDS: $23.06M
MONOF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $7.48B. SBDS’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $23.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $51.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MONOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBDS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MONOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MONOF is a better buy in the long-term than SBDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MONOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBDS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MONOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SBDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MONOF is a better buy in the short-term than SBDS.

Price Growth

MONOF (@Internet Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBDS (@Internet Retail) price change was -29.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +360.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-2.28% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MONOF($7.48B) has a higher market cap than SBDS($23.1M). SBDS YTD gains are higher at: 1128.070 vs. MONOF (4.406). MONOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 47.7B vs. SBDS (-166.65M). MONOF has more cash in the bank: 35.8B vs. SBDS (18.1M). SBDS has less debt than MONOF: SBDS (265M) vs MONOF (10.3B). MONOF has higher revenues than SBDS: MONOF (309B) vs SBDS (407M).
MONOFSBDSMONOF / SBDS
Capitalization7.48B23.1M32,377%
EBITDA47.7B-166.65M-28,622%
Gain YTD4.4061128.0700%
P/E Ratio40.99N/A-
Revenue309B407M75,921%
Total Cash35.8B18.1M197,790%
Total Debt10.3B265M3,887%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MONOFSBDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MONOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MHI8.94N/A
N/A
Pioneer Municipal High Income Fund
HYTI19.98-0.02
-0.08%
FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF
AWF11.28-0.04
-0.35%
ALLIANCEBERSTEIN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND
CCSO24.75-0.10
-0.40%
Carbon Collective Climate Sol US Eq ETF
QBTX178.60-20.61
-10.35%
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF

MONOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MONOF and SBDS have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MONOF and SBDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MONOF
1D Price
Change %
MONOF100%
N/A
SBDS - MONOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
DROOF - MONOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
DIBS - MONOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
DELHY - MONOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.69%
OISXF - MONOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBDS has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBDS jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBDS
1D Price
Change %
SBDS100%
-1.75%
CVNA - SBDS
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
W - SBDS
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
AMZN - SBDS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
RVLV - SBDS
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
MOGU - SBDS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
More