MOS
Price
$35.26
Change
+$0.08 (+0.23%)
Updated
Jun 27, 01:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.44B
38 days until earnings call
SMG
Price
$65.83
Change
+$0.85 (+1.31%)
Updated
Jun 27, 01:20 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.23B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MOS vs SMG

Header iconMOS vs SMG Comparison
Open Charts MOS vs SMGBanner chart's image
Mosaic Company (The)
Price$35.26
Change+$0.08 (+0.23%)
Volume$1.78K
Capitalization10.44B
Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (The)
Price$65.83
Change+$0.85 (+1.31%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.23B
MOS vs SMG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MOS vs. SMG commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MOS is a Buy and SMG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MOS: $35.18 vs. SMG: $64.98)
Brand notoriety: MOS: Notable vs. SMG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MOS: 67% vs. SMG: 58%
Market capitalization -- MOS: $10.44B vs. SMG: $4.23B
MOS [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $10.44B. SMG’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $4.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $40.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MOS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MOS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MOS is a better buy in the long-term than SMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MOS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MOS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOS is a better buy in the short-term than SMG.

Price Growth

MOS (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -3.46% price change this week, while SMG (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +6.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

MOS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

SMG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (-0.53% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOS($10.4B) has a higher market cap than SMG($4.23B). SMG has higher P/E ratio than MOS: SMG (11.45) vs MOS (9.27). MOS YTD gains are higher at: 45.310 vs. SMG (0.075). MOS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.48B vs. SMG (-207.6M). MOS has more cash in the bank: 349M vs. SMG (10.4M). SMG has less debt than MOS: SMG (3.02B) vs MOS (4B). MOS has higher revenues than SMG: MOS (13.7B) vs SMG (3.44B).
MOSSMGMOS / SMG
Capitalization10.4B4.23B246%
EBITDA2.48B-207.6M-1,193%
Gain YTD45.3100.07560,765%
P/E Ratio9.2711.4581%
Revenue13.7B3.44B399%
Total Cash349M10.4M3,356%
Total Debt4B3.02B132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MOS vs SMG: Fundamental Ratings
MOS
SMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
8697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
728
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a24

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MOS's Valuation (48) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMG (85). This means that MOS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMG’s over the last 12 months.

MOS's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMG (100). This means that MOS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMG’s over the last 12 months.

MOS's SMR Rating (86) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as SMG (97). This means that MOS’s stock grew similarly to SMG’s over the last 12 months.

MOS's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMG (48). This means that MOS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMG’s over the last 12 months.

MOS's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as SMG (28). This means that MOS’s stock grew similarly to SMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MOSSMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNGG206.905.95
+2.96%
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
ENFR32.160.63
+2.00%
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
QQQS26.890.32
+1.20%
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
SPYI50.090.22
+0.44%
NEOS S&P 500(R) High Income ETF
XBIL50.130.01
+0.02%
US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF

MOS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOS has been closely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOS jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOS
1D Price
Change %
MOS100%
-0.82%
NTR - MOS
74%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
CF - MOS
72%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
CTVA - MOS
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
IPI - MOS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
ICL - MOS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
More

SMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMG has been loosely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMG jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMG
1D Price
Change %
SMG100%
+1.04%
CTVA - SMG
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
MOS - SMG
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
IPI - SMG
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
FMC - SMG
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
NTR - SMG
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
More