Compare trend and price MPAY vs SEIC
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPAY is a Hold and SEIC is a Hold.
SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MPAY | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 6 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 47% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IVW | 83.37 | 1.52 | +1.86% |
| iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | |||
| LGRO | 29.55 | 0.46 | +1.58% |
| Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF | |||
| IDRV | 31.38 | 0.35 | +1.13% |
| iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF | |||
| IYC | 79.09 | 0.67 | +0.85% |
| iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF | |||
| BERZ | 28.50 | -1.81 | -5.97% |
| MicroSectors™ St FANG&Inn 3X Inv Ld ETNs | |||
MPAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPAY has been loosely correlated with IBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPAY jumps, then IBP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPAY | 100% | +1.21% | ||
| IBP - MPAY | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| TMHC - MPAY | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| SEIC - MPAY | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| ITT - MPAY | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| LOW - MPAY | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
More | ||||
SEIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| BLK - SEIC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| JHG - SEIC | 67% Closely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| BEN - SEIC | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| IVZ - SEIC | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.13% | ||
More | ||||