IBP vs MPAY ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBP is a Hold and MPAY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IBP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
- IBP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IBP’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- IBP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
IBP (@Homebuilding) experienced а +1.69% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
IBP is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Homebuilding (+4.01% weekly)Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
IBP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IBP | MPAY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ADPV | 29.54 | 0.44 | +1.50% |
| Adaptiv™ Select ETF | |||
| SPEM | 37.63 | 0.27 | +0.72% |
| SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | |||
| USBF | 82.61 | 0.42 | +0.51% |
| iShares USD Systematic Bond ETF | |||
| JPLD | 50.71 | 0.08 | +0.17% |
| JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF | |||
| KLIP | 14.66 | 0.02 | +0.14% |
| KraneShares China InternetAndCovCllStETF | |||
IBP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBP has been closely correlated with TMHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBP jumps, then TMHC could also see price increases.
MPAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPAY has been loosely correlated with IBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPAY jumps, then IBP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPAY | 100% | +1.21% | ||
| IBP - MPAY | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| TMHC - MPAY | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| SEIC - MPAY | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| ITT - MPAY | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| LOW - MPAY | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
More | ||||