MPB
Price
$28.12
Change
-$0.64 (-2.23%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
661.45M
14 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$19.32
Change
-$0.07 (-0.36%)
Updated
Oct 8, 01:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.81B
8 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MPB vs SFNC

Header iconMPB vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts MPB vs SFNCBanner chart's image
Mid Penn Ban
Price$28.12
Change-$0.64 (-2.23%)
Volume$200
Capitalization661.45M
Simmons First National
Price$19.32
Change-$0.07 (-0.36%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.81B
MPB vs SFNC Comparison Chart in %
MPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MPB vs. SFNC commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPB is a Hold and SFNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MPB: $28.76 vs. SFNC: $19.39)
Brand notoriety: MPB and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPB: 107% vs. SFNC: 75%
Market capitalization -- MPB: $661.45M vs. SFNC: $2.81B
MPB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $661.45M. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPB is a better buy in the long-term than SFNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MPB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MPB is a better buy in the short-term than SFNC.

Price Growth

MPB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.42% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

MPB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.18% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($2.81B) has a higher market cap than MPB($661M). SFNC has higher P/E ratio than MPB: SFNC (15.27) vs MPB (12.24). MPB YTD gains are higher at: 1.833 vs. SFNC (-9.713). SFNC has more cash in the bank: 398M vs. MPB (47.7M). MPB has less debt than SFNC: MPB (76M) vs SFNC (1B). SFNC has higher revenues than MPB: SFNC (795M) vs MPB (192M).
MPBSFNCMPB / SFNC
Capitalization661M2.81B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.833-9.713-19%
P/E Ratio12.2415.2780%
Revenue192M795M24%
Total Cash47.7M398M12%
Total Debt76M1B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPB vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
MPB
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5663
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4771
SMR RATING
1..100
3715
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3278
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPB's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (53) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MPB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

MPB's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MPB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's SMR Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MPB (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to MPB’s over the last 12 months.

MPB's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (61) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MPB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

MPB's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (78) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MPB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPBSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBSAX13.96N/A
N/A
VY® Baron Growth A
GITCX17.27N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Technology Opps C
NDVRX16.44N/A
N/A
MFS New Discovery Value R1
PJDCX18.88N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend C
MADVX21.35-0.02
-0.09%
BlackRock Equity Dividend Instl