MPZZF
Price
$1.74
Change
+$0.05 (+2.96%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
766.24M
MSLOF
Price
$32.50
Change
-$1.45 (-4.27%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
12.75B
Ad is loading...

MPZZF vs MSLOF

Header iconMPZZF vs MSLOF Comparison
Open Charts MPZZF vs MSLOFBanner chart's image
MPC Container Ships AS
Price$1.74
Change+$0.05 (+2.96%)
Volume$301
Capitalization766.24M
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines
Price$32.50
Change-$1.45 (-4.27%)
Volume$219
Capitalization12.75B
MPZZF vs MSLOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MPZZF vs. MSLOF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPZZF is a StrongBuy and MSLOF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MPZZF: $1.74 vs. MSLOF: $32.50)
Brand notoriety: MPZZF and MSLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPZZF: 2% vs. MSLOF: 14%
Market capitalization -- MPZZF: $766.24M vs. MSLOF: $12.75B
MPZZF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $766.24M. MSLOF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $12.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPZZF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMSLOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MPZZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MSLOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than MSLOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPZZF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MPZZF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MPZZF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +4.82% price change this week, while MSLOF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.17% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSLOF($12.8B) has a higher market cap than MPZZF($766M). MSLOF has higher P/E ratio than MPZZF: MSLOF (4.18) vs MPZZF (3.22). MPZZF YTD gains are higher at: -5.946 vs. MSLOF (-7.143). MSLOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 505B vs. MPZZF (330M). MSLOF has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. MPZZF (135M). MPZZF has less debt than MSLOF: MPZZF (202M) vs MSLOF (1.37T). MSLOF has higher revenues than MPZZF: MSLOF (1.74T) vs MPZZF (563M).
MPZZFMSLOFMPZZF / MSLOF
Capitalization766M12.8B6%
EBITDA330M505B0%
Gain YTD-5.946-7.14383%
P/E Ratio3.224.1877%
Revenue563M1.74T0%
Total Cash135M148B0%
Total Debt202M1.37T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPZZF vs MSLOF: Fundamental Ratings
MPZZF
MSLOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10043
SMR RATING
1..100
319
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5671
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
990
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPZZF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MSLOF (15). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to MSLOF’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPZZF (100). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MPZZF (31). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew similarly to MPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as MSLOF (71). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to MSLOF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSLOF (90). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew significantly faster than MSLOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPZZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRNDY20.700.39
+1.92%
Pernod Ricard S.A.
EDPFY31.680.04
+0.13%
EDP Energias de Portugal SA
ASXFY42.40-1.26
-2.89%
ASX, Ltd.
ARWYF0.04N/A
-6.52%
ARWAY CORP.
LLKKF0.02N/A
-13.70%
Lake Resources N.L.

MPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPZZF has been loosely correlated with HPGLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPZZF jumps, then HPGLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPZZF
1D Price
Change %
MPZZF100%
+2.96%
HPGLY - MPZZF
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
AMKBY - MPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
SBLK - MPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.06%
HAFN - MPZZF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HLAGF - MPZZF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

MSLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSLOF and HPGLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSLOF and HPGLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSLOF
1D Price
Change %
MSLOF100%
N/A
HPGLY - MSLOF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
KAKKF - MSLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLAGF - MSLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTSHF - MSLOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
MPZZF - MSLOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
More