MPZZF
Price
$1.63
Change
+$0.02 (+1.25%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
723.25M
MSLOF
Price
$32.60
Change
-$5.05 (-13.41%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
11.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MPZZF vs MSLOF

Header iconMPZZF vs MSLOF Comparison
Open Charts MPZZF vs MSLOFBanner chart's image
MPC Container Ships AS
Price$1.63
Change+$0.02 (+1.25%)
Volume$1.11K
Capitalization723.25M
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines
Price$32.60
Change-$5.05 (-13.41%)
Volume$100
Capitalization11.88B
MPZZF vs MSLOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MPZZF vs. MSLOF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPZZF is a Hold and MSLOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MPZZF: $1.63 vs. MSLOF: $32.60)
Brand notoriety: MPZZF and MSLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPZZF: 5% vs. MSLOF: 66%
Market capitalization -- MPZZF: $723.25M vs. MSLOF: $11.88B
MPZZF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $723.25M. MSLOF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $11.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMSLOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MSLOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSLOF is a better buy in the long-term than MPZZF.

Price Growth

MPZZF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +1.56% price change this week, while MSLOF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.71% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSLOF($11.9B) has a higher market cap than MPZZF($723M). MSLOF has higher P/E ratio than MPZZF: MSLOF (3.95) vs MPZZF (2.90). MSLOF (-6.857) and MPZZF (-7.175) have similar YTD gains . MSLOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 505B vs. MPZZF (358M). MPZZF has less debt than MSLOF: MPZZF (343M) vs MSLOF (1.37T). MSLOF has higher revenues than MPZZF: MSLOF (1.74T) vs MPZZF (540M).
MPZZFMSLOFMPZZF / MSLOF
Capitalization723M11.9B6%
EBITDA358M505B0%
Gain YTD-7.175-6.857105%
P/E Ratio2.903.9573%
Revenue540M1.74T0%
Total CashN/A148B-
Total Debt343M1.37T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPZZF vs MSLOF: Fundamental Ratings
MPZZF
MSLOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9046
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10048
SMR RATING
1..100
288
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7392
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPZZF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MSLOF (10). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to MSLOF’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPZZF (100). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as MPZZF (28). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew similarly to MPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as MSLOF (60). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to MSLOF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as MSLOF (92). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to MSLOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NNOMF0.450.01
+2.71%
Nano One Materials Corp.
APAAF0.08N/A
+2.62%
APPIA RARE EARTHS & URANIUM CORP.
TLPFY51.990.49
+0.95%
Teleperformance
DNKEY19.930.18
+0.93%
Danske Bank A/S
BAYRY7.590.07
+0.92%
Bayer A.G.

MPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPZZF has been loosely correlated with HPGLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPZZF jumps, then HPGLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPZZF
1D Price
Change %
MPZZF100%
+1.88%
HPGLY - MPZZF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMKBY - MPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.85%
SBLK - MPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
HAFN - MPZZF
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
HLAGF - MPZZF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

MSLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSLOF and HPGLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSLOF and HPGLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSLOF
1D Price
Change %
MSLOF100%
N/A
HPGLY - MSLOF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAKKF - MSLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLAGF - MSLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTSHF - MSLOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.08%
MPZZF - MSLOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
More