MPZZF
Price
$1.26
Change
-$0.22 (-14.86%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
578.91M
PCFBY
Price
$4.53
Change
-$0.17 (-3.62%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
Ad is loading...

MPZZF vs PCFBY

Header iconMPZZF vs PCFBY Comparison
Open Charts MPZZF vs PCFBYBanner chart's image
MPC Container Ships AS
Price$1.26
Change-$0.22 (-14.86%)
Volume$192.69K
Capitalization578.91M
Pacific Basin Shipping
Price$4.53
Change-$0.17 (-3.62%)
Volume$789
Capitalization1.13B
MPZZF vs PCFBY Comparison Chart
Loading...
MPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MPZZF vs. PCFBY commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPZZF is a Hold and PCFBY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MPZZF: $1.26 vs. PCFBY: $4.53)
Brand notoriety: MPZZF and PCFBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPZZF: 1015% vs. PCFBY: 34%
Market capitalization -- MPZZF: $578.91M vs. PCFBY: $1.13B
MPZZF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $578.91M. PCFBY’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPZZF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePCFBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MPZZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PCFBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than PCFBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPZZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MPZZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MPZZF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -17.65% price change this week, while PCFBY (@Marine Shipping) price change was +3.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -8.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-8.96% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCFBY($1.13B) has a higher market cap than MPZZF($579M). PCFBY has higher P/E ratio than MPZZF: PCFBY (9.17) vs MPZZF (2.10). PCFBY YTD gains are higher at: 4.378 vs. MPZZF (-28.025). MPZZF (358M) and PCFBY (357M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . MPZZF (343M) and PCFBY (344M) have identical debt. PCFBY has higher revenues than MPZZF: PCFBY (2.58B) vs MPZZF (540M).
MPZZFPCFBYMPZZF / PCFBY
Capitalization579M1.13B51%
EBITDA358M357M100%
Gain YTD-28.0254.378-640%
P/E Ratio2.109.1723%
Revenue540M2.58B21%
Total CashN/A282M-
Total Debt343M344M100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPZZF vs PCFBY: Fundamental Ratings
MPZZF
PCFBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9276
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
2991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1883
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
23n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPZZF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as PCFBY (21). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to PCFBY’s over the last 12 months.

PCFBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPZZF (100). This means that PCFBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCFBY (91). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCFBY’s over the last 12 months.

PCFBY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MPZZF (64). This means that PCFBY’s stock grew similarly to MPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCFBY (83). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCFBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPZZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGOAX32.17N/A
N/A
Patient Opportunity A
FSKLX11.78N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI Intl Low Volatil Idx
VYMRX14.65N/A
N/A
Voya Mid Cap Research Enhanced Index C
PAHUX6.31N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison NextGeneration Glb Opps Z
IDHCX16.86-1.07
-5.97%
Integrity Dividend Harvest C

MPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPZZF has been loosely correlated with HPGLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPZZF jumps, then HPGLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPZZF
1D Price
Change %
MPZZF100%
-14.58%
HPGLY - MPZZF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMKBY - MPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-11.17%
SBLK - MPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-7.95%
HAFN - MPZZF
35%
Loosely correlated
-9.43%
HLAGF - MPZZF
34%
Loosely correlated
-10.70%
More

PCFBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCFBY and OROVY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCFBY and OROVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCFBY
1D Price
Change %
PCFBY100%
N/A
OROVY - PCFBY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPZZF - PCFBY
10%
Poorly correlated
-14.58%
NPNYY - PCFBY
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
NYUKF - PCFBY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OROVF - PCFBY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More