MPZZF
Price
$1.88
Change
+$0.03 (+1.62%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
840.22M
PCFBY
Price
$5.99
Change
+$0.44 (+7.93%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MPZZF vs PCFBY

Header iconMPZZF vs PCFBY Comparison
Open Charts MPZZF vs PCFBYBanner chart's image
MPC Container Ships AS
Price$1.88
Change+$0.03 (+1.62%)
Volume$600
Capitalization840.22M
Pacific Basin Shipping
Price$5.99
Change+$0.44 (+7.93%)
Volume$145
Capitalization1.48B
MPZZF vs PCFBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCFBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MPZZF vs. PCFBY commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPZZF is a StrongBuy and PCFBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MPZZF: $1.88 vs. PCFBY: $5.99)
Brand notoriety: MPZZF and PCFBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPZZF: 3% vs. PCFBY: 4%
Market capitalization -- MPZZF: $840.22M vs. PCFBY: $1.48B
MPZZF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $840.22M. PCFBY’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $33.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePCFBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PCFBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than PCFBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPZZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCFBY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MPZZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PCFBY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCFBY is a better buy in the short-term than MPZZF.

Price Growth

MPZZF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +4.44% price change this week, while PCFBY (@Marine Shipping) price change was +7.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+1.00% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCFBY($1.48B) has a higher market cap than MPZZF($840M). PCFBY has higher P/E ratio than MPZZF: PCFBY (15.85) vs MPZZF (3.36). PCFBY YTD gains are higher at: 42.142 vs. MPZZF (6.609). PCFBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 357M vs. MPZZF (336M). PCFBY has less debt than MPZZF: PCFBY (344M) vs MPZZF (433M). PCFBY has higher revenues than MPZZF: PCFBY (2.58B) vs MPZZF (520M).
MPZZFPCFBYMPZZF / PCFBY
Capitalization840M1.48B57%
EBITDA336M357M94%
Gain YTD6.60942.14216%
P/E Ratio3.3615.8521%
Revenue520M2.58B20%
Total CashN/A63.5M-
Total Debt433M344M126%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPZZF vs PCFBY: Fundamental Ratings
MPZZF
PCFBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3186
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10045
SMR RATING
1..100
3181
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4762
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPZZF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as PCFBY (20). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to PCFBY’s over the last 12 months.

PCFBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPZZF (100). This means that PCFBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCFBY (81). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCFBY’s over the last 12 months.

PCFBY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MPZZF (46). This means that PCFBY’s stock grew similarly to MPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PCFBY (62). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to PCFBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPZZFPCFBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCFBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IHIFX5.98N/A
N/A
Macquarie High Income Fund Class R6
RYNCX116.06N/A
N/A
Rydex Nova C
IVFLX4.37N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Intl Strat Val Div R6
MIGHX44.04N/A
N/A
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk R3
SSEFX14.23N/A
N/A
SouthernSun U.S. Equity, N

MPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPZZF has been loosely correlated with HPGLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPZZF jumps, then HPGLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPZZF
1D Price
Change %
MPZZF100%
+1.62%
HPGLY - MPZZF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMKBY - MPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
SBLK - MPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
HAFN - MPZZF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HLAGF - MPZZF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

PCFBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCFBY and OROVY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCFBY and OROVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCFBY
1D Price
Change %
PCFBY100%
+7.93%
OROVY - PCFBY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPZZF - PCFBY
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
NPNYY - PCFBY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
NYUKF - PCFBY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OROVF - PCFBY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More