MQ
Price
$6.28
Change
-$0.09 (-1.41%)
Updated
Dec 4, 6:59 PM EST
92 days until earnings call
PAGS
Price
$10.77
Change
-$0.07 (-0.65%)
Updated
Dec 4, 6:59 PM EST
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions MQ vs PAGS

Header iconMQ vs PAGS Comparison
Open Charts MQ vs PAGSBanner chart's image
Marqeta
Price$6.28
Change-$0.09 (-1.41%)
Volume$2.63M
CapitalizationN/A
PagSeguro Digital
Price$10.77
Change-$0.07 (-0.65%)
Volume$1.07M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MQ vs PAGS Comparison Chart

Loading...

Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
VS
MQ vs. PAGS commentary
Dec 05, 2023

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MQ is a Buy and PAGS is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2023
Stock price -- (MQ: $6.28 vs. PAGS: $10.77)
Brand notoriety: MQ and PAGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MQ: 76% vs. PAGS: 71%
Market capitalization -- MQ: $3.2B vs. PAGS: $3.08B
MQ [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.2B. PAGS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $2.84T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MQ is a better buy in the long-term than PAGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MQ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAGS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MQ and PAGS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MQ (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.28% price change this week, while PAGS (@Packaged Software) price change was +11.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

MQ is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2024.

PAGS is expected to report earnings on Feb 22, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.00% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MQ with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for PAGS with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MQ($3.2B) and PAGS($3.08B) have the same market capitalization . PAGS YTD gains are higher at: 23.227 vs. MQ (2.782). PAGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.49B vs. MQ (-272.4M). PAGS has more cash in the bank: 3.05B vs. MQ (1.3B). MQ has less debt than PAGS: MQ (9.93M) vs PAGS (193M). PAGS has higher revenues than MQ: PAGS (8.89B) vs MQ (761M).
MQPAGSMQ / PAGS
Capitalization3.2B3.08B104%
EBITDA-272.4M6.49B-4%
Gain YTD2.78223.22712%
P/E RatioN/A10.01-
Revenue761M8.89B9%
Total Cash1.3B3.05B42%
Total Debt9.93M193M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAGS: Fundamental Ratings
PAGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MQPAGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAXS14.480.03
+0.21%
PIMCO Access Income Fund
ONLN33.610.06
+0.18%
ProShares Online Retail ETF
DJD43.880.07
+0.15%
Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Avg Div ETF
BTR23.00-0.04
-0.15%
Beacon Tactical Risk ETF
ROBO52.70-0.49
-0.92%
Robo Global® Robotics&Automation ETF

MQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MQ has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MQ jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQ
1D Price
Change %
MQ100%
-1.41%
COIN - MQ
64%
Loosely correlated
+5.49%
CLSK - MQ
59%
Loosely correlated
+16.03%
AVDX - MQ
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
COMP - MQ
51%
Loosely correlated
+4.12%
RIOT - MQ
50%
Loosely correlated
+8.86%
More

PAGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGS has been closely correlated with STNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGS jumps, then STNE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAGS
1D Price
Change %
PAGS100%
-0.65%
STNE - PAGS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
COIN - PAGS
53%
Loosely correlated
+5.49%
CLSK - PAGS
46%
Loosely correlated
+16.03%
RPAY - PAGS
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
EVTC - PAGS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More