MRC
Price
$12.76
Change
+$0.16 (+1.27%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.06B
66 days until earnings call
TAGP
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
104.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRC vs TAGP

Header iconMRC vs TAGP Comparison
Open Charts MRC vs TAGPBanner chart's image
MRC Global
Price$12.76
Change+$0.16 (+1.27%)
Volume$3.14K
Capitalization1.06B
Tristar Acquisition Group
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$35.5K
Capitalization104.71M
MRC vs TAGP Comparison Chart
Loading...
MRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRC vs. TAGP commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRC is a Hold and TAGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MRC: $12.60 vs. TAGP: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: MRC and TAGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRC: 77% vs. TAGP: 127%
Market capitalization -- MRC: $1.06B vs. TAGP: $104.71M
MRC [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.06B. TAGP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $104.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTAGP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MRC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TAGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRC is a better buy in the long-term than TAGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MRC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

MRC (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.48% price change this week, while TAGP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +25.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +5.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

MRC is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+5.06% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRC($1.06B) has a higher market cap than TAGP($105M). TAGP YTD gains are higher at: 104.545 vs. MRC (-1.408). MRC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 225M vs. TAGP (-58.87K). MRC has more cash in the bank: 131M vs. TAGP (7.39M). TAGP has less debt than MRC: TAGP (40.3M) vs MRC (521M). MRC has higher revenues than TAGP: MRC (3.41B) vs TAGP (0).
MRCTAGPMRC / TAGP
Capitalization1.06B105M1,010%
EBITDA225M-58.87K-382,179%
Gain YTD-1.408104.545-1%
P/E Ratio11.91N/A-
Revenue3.41B0-
Total Cash131M7.39M1,774%
Total Debt521M40.3M1,293%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRC vs TAGP: Fundamental Ratings
MRC
TAGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6292
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
90100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAGP's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRC (70) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that TAGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRC’s over the last 12 months.

MRC's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for TAGP (100) in the null industry. This means that MRC’s stock grew significantly faster than TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

MRC's SMR Rating (90) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as TAGP (100) in the null industry. This means that MRC’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

TAGP's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MRC (52) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that TAGP’s stock grew similarly to MRC’s over the last 12 months.

MRC's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for TAGP (100) in the null industry. This means that MRC’s stock grew significantly faster than TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TFEQX12.00N/A
N/A
Templeton Instl Intl Eq Ser Primary
SLVRX33.97N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Large Cap Value R
JBSOX22.07N/A
N/A
JHancock New Opportunities C
MRIGX33.60N/A
N/A
Meridian Growth Investor
TRTIX20.66N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq I

TAGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAGP and MRC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAGP and MRC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAGP
1D Price
Change %
TAGP100%
N/A
MRC - TAGP
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
QSEP - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
SAPMY - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
WYGPY - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.46%
TOLWF - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More