MRCHF
Price
$23.50
Change
+$0.75 (+3.30%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.24B
NNCSF
Price
$2.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
792.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRCHF vs NNCSF

Header iconMRCHF vs NNCSF Comparison
Open Charts MRCHF vs NNCSFBanner chart's image
Miraca Holdings
Price$23.50
Change+$0.75 (+3.30%)
Volume$800
Capitalization1.24B
Nanosonics
Price$2.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization792.36M
MRCHF vs NNCSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MRCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NNCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRCHF vs. NNCSF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCHF is a Buy and NNCSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (MRCHF: $22.50 vs. NNCSF: $2.45)
Brand notoriety: MRCHF and NNCSF are both not notable
MRCHF represents the Medical Specialties, while NNCSF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRCHF: 94% vs. NNCSF: 107%
Market capitalization -- MRCHF: $1.24B vs. NNCSF: $792.36M
MRCHF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $1.24B. NNCSF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $792.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $169.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $9.9B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $10.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRCHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNNCSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MRCHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NNCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRCHF is a better buy in the long-term than NNCSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRCHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NNCSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRCHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NNCSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRCHF is a better buy in the short-term than NNCSF.

Price Growth

MRCHF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -4.26% price change this week, while NNCSF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.76%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+3.68% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+1.39% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRCHF($1.24B) has a higher market cap than NNCSF($792M). NNCSF (70.33) and MRCHF (68.34) have similar P/E ratio . MRCHF YTD gains are higher at: 40.889 vs. NNCSF (16.667). MRCHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.6B vs. NNCSF (28.2M). MRCHF has more cash in the bank: 47B vs. NNCSF (130M). NNCSF has less debt than MRCHF: NNCSF (9.3M) vs MRCHF (80.1B). MRCHF has higher revenues than NNCSF: MRCHF (240B) vs NNCSF (186M).
MRCHFNNCSFMRCHF / NNCSF
Capitalization1.24B792M157%
EBITDA13.6B28.2M48,227%
Gain YTD40.88916.667245%
P/E Ratio68.3470.3397%
Revenue240B186M129,032%
Total Cash47B130M36,154%
Total Debt80.1B9.3M861,013%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRCHF vs NNCSF: Fundamental Ratings
MRCHF
NNCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9035
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8971
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5028
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRCHF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NNCSF (98). This means that MRCHF’s stock grew significantly faster than NNCSF’s over the last 12 months.

MRCHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NNCSF (100). This means that MRCHF’s stock grew similarly to NNCSF’s over the last 12 months.

NNCSF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCHF (89). This means that NNCSF’s stock grew similarly to MRCHF’s over the last 12 months.

MRCHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NNCSF (58). This means that MRCHF’s stock grew similarly to NNCSF’s over the last 12 months.

NNCSF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCHF (50). This means that NNCSF’s stock grew similarly to MRCHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRCHFNNCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
90%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NNCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCBOX30.80N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy 1
LOGWX30.85N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F3
TANDX37.86N/A
N/A
Castle Tandem No-Load
PAREX11.63N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Real Estate Advisor
BWLRX24.88-0.08
-0.32%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R6

MRCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRCHF has been loosely correlated with RCEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRCHF jumps, then RCEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRCHF
1D Price
Change %
MRCHF100%
-4.26%
RCEL - MRCHF
38%
Loosely correlated
+13.06%
NHNKY - MRCHF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
NHNKF - MRCHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NNCSF - MRCHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBGNF - MRCHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NNCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NNCSF and ASAPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNCSF and ASAPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NNCSF
1D Price
Change %
NNCSF100%
N/A
ASAPF - NNCSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
NHNKY - NNCSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
NHNKF - NNCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVYTF - NNCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRCHF - NNCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
More