It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MRK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNYNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MRK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNYNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MRK (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -0.61% price change this week, while SNYNF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -4.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.25%.
MRK is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
MRK | SNYNF | MRK / SNYNF | |
Capitalization | 332B | 134B | 248% |
EBITDA | 6.91B | 13.8B | 50% |
Gain YTD | -6.364 | -5.285 | 120% |
P/E Ratio | 935.64 | 14.04 | 6,662% |
Revenue | 60.1B | 46.1B | 130% |
Total Cash | 7.09B | 7.99B | 89% |
Total Debt | 35.1B | 21B | 167% |
MRK | SNYNF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 72 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SNYNF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MRK (17) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SNYNF’s stock grew similarly to MRK’s over the last 12 months.
MRK's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNYNF (96) in the null industry. This means that MRK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNYNF’s over the last 12 months.
MRK's SMR Rating (34) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNYNF (81) in the null industry. This means that MRK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNYNF’s over the last 12 months.
MRK's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as SNYNF (72) in the null industry. This means that MRK’s stock grew similarly to SNYNF’s over the last 12 months.
SNYNF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRK (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SNYNF’s stock grew significantly faster than MRK’s over the last 12 months.
MRK | SNYNF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago57% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago50% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago51% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago50% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago46% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago47% | 16 days ago52% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago50% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago57% | 2 days ago55% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago46% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MRK and AZN have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRK and AZN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MRK | 100% | +1.35% | ||
AZN - MRK | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
GSK - MRK | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
NVS - MRK | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
BIIB - MRK | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.99% | ||
SNYNF - MRK | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNYNF has been loosely correlated with SNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNYNF jumps, then SNY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNYNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SNYNF | 100% | -0.43% | ||
SNY - SNYNF | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
NVSEF - SNYNF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.84% | ||
AZN - SNYNF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
JNJ - SNYNF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
NVS - SNYNF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
More |