Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MRPCX vs RNWBX
MRPCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MRPCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Sustainable Em Mkts Eq R
Price$10.19
Change-$0.04 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.65M
American Funds New World R2
Price$83.92
Change-$0.55 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.82B
MRPCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MRPCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRPCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69.8B vs. MRPCX (76.6M). MRPCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MRPCX (3.00) vs RNWBX (0.13). MRPCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MRPCX (23 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). MRPCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). MRPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). MRPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: MRPCX (100) vs RNWBX (250). MRPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.03 vs. RNWBX (10.68). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.01 vs. MRPCX (-10.23).
| MRPCX | RNWBX | MRPCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.67 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.358 | 14.099 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.6M | 69.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 0.13 | 2,342% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.03 | 10.68 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.60 | 30.02 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.23 | 21.01 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.09 | 62.01 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement