Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MRPCX vs RNWHX
MRPCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MRPCX vs RNWHX
BlackRock Sustainable Em Mkts Eq R
Price$10.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.03M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.34
Change+$0.10 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.31B
MRPCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MRPCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRPCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.3B vs. MRPCX (79M). MRPCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MRPCX (3.00) vs RNWHX (0.99). MRPCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MRPCX (23 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MRPCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MRPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). MRPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: MRPCX (100) vs RNWHX (250). MRPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.97 vs. RNWHX (10.75). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 28.65 vs. MRPCX (-10.97).
| MRPCX | RNWHX | MRPCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.72 | 272% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.600 | 16.206 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79M | 70.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 0.99 | 303% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.97 | 10.75 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.04 | 38.21 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.97 | 28.65 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement