Advertisement
MRSKF vs MSUXF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRSKF is a Hold and MSUXF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MRSKF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMSUXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MRSKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MSUXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
MRSKF (@Tools & Hardware) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MSUXF (@Tools & Hardware) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.37%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Tools & Hardware (-2.19% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
| MRSKF | MSUXF | MRSKF / MSUXF | |
| Capitalization | 2.83B | 4.27B | 66% |
| EBITDA | 85.6B | 62.3B | 137% |
| Gain YTD | 27.257 | -16.521 | -165% |
| P/E Ratio | 58.46 | 14.69 | 398% |
| Revenue | 564B | 386B | 146% |
| Total Cash | 33.1B | 145B | 23% |
| Total Debt | 97.8B | N/A | - |
MSUXF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MRSKF | MSUXF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 17% | 4 days ago 18% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 18% | 4 days ago 20% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
MRSKF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRSKF has been loosely correlated with PRPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRSKF jumps, then PRPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRSKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRSKF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PRPI - MRSKF | 50% Loosely correlated | -7.50% | ||
| FSCR - MRSKF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KMAAF - MRSKF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MLSPF - MRSKF | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
| NCTKF - MRSKF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MSUXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSUXF has been loosely correlated with HAIIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSUXF jumps, then HAIIF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSUXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSUXF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HAIIF - MSUXF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MLSPF - MSUXF | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
| MKTAY - MSUXF | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| NCTKF - MSUXF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MRSKF - MSUXF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||