MS
Price
$163.32
Change
+$0.67 (+0.41%)
Updated
Oct 16, 02:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
258.78B
91 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PIPR
Price
$341.25
Change
-$6.01 (-1.73%)
Updated
Oct 16, 12:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.14B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MS vs PIPR

Header iconMS vs PIPR Comparison
Open Charts MS vs PIPRBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$163.32
Change+$0.67 (+0.41%)
Volume$1.67K
Capitalization258.78B
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$341.25
Change-$6.01 (-1.73%)
Volume$200
Capitalization6.14B
MS vs PIPR Comparison Chart in %
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MS vs. PIPR commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a Hold and PIPR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MS: $162.65 vs. PIPR: $347.26)
Brand notoriety: MS: Notable vs. PIPR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 255% vs. PIPR: 125%
Market capitalization -- MS: $258.78B vs. PIPR: $6.14B
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $258.78B. PIPR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $6.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the long-term than PIPR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PIPR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.50% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +93.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.11% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($259B) has a higher market cap than PIPR($6.14B). PIPR has higher P/E ratio than MS: PIPR (29.26) vs MS (16.68). MS YTD gains are higher at: 32.193 vs. PIPR (17.831). PIPR has less debt than MS: PIPR (116M) vs MS (352B). MS has higher revenues than PIPR: MS (61.5B) vs PIPR (1.55B).
MSPIPRMS / PIPR
Capitalization259B6.14B4,216%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.19317.831181%
P/E Ratio16.6829.2657%
Revenue61.5B1.55B3,975%
Total Cash4.29BN/A-
Total Debt352B116M303,448%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs PIPR: Fundamental Ratings
MS
PIPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8366
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1120
SMR RATING
1..100
543
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5580
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MS's Valuation (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (31) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (20) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIPR (43) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (45) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

MS's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (80) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSPIPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROM93.721.91
+2.08%
ProShares Ultra Technology
KSEP27.780.09
+0.33%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Sep
FUNL45.990.04
+0.09%
CornerCap Fundametrics® Lrg-Cap ETF FUNL
AAA25.020.01
+0.05%
Alternative AccessFirstPriorityCLO BdETF
DIA462.71N/A
N/A
SPDR® Dow Jones Industrial Avrg ETF Tr