MS
Price
$81.66
Change
-$0.52 (-0.63%)
Updated
Sep 27, 6:59 PM EST
20 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$60.39
Change
+$0.04 (+0.07%)
Updated
Sep 27, 6:59 PM EST
33 days until earnings call

Compare predictions MS vs SF

Header iconMS vs SF Comparison
Open Charts MS vs SFBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$81.66
Change-$0.52 (-0.63%)
Volume$1.96M
CapitalizationN/A
Stifel Financial
Price$60.39
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
Volume$293.36K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MS vs SF Comparison Chart

Loading...

Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
VS
MS vs. SF commentary
Sep 28, 2023

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a Hold and SF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2023
Stock price -- (MS: $82.17 vs. SF: $60.35)
Brand notoriety: MS: Notable vs. SF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 84% vs. SF: 133%
Market capitalization -- MS: $136.15B vs. SF: $6.53B
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $136.15B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $6.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $9.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the long-term than SF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -7.16% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -8.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +403.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Oct 18, 2023.

SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.49% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MS with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for SF with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($136B) has a higher market cap than SF($6.53B). MS has higher P/E ratio than SF: MS (14.45) vs SF (12.02). SF YTD gains are higher at: 5.187 vs. MS (-0.820). SF has less debt than MS: SF (1.18B) vs MS (256B). MS has higher revenues than SF: MS (50.3B) vs SF (4.27B).
MSSFMS / SF
Capitalization136B6.53B2,081%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.8205.187-16%
P/E Ratio14.4512.02120%
Revenue50.3B4.27B1,178%
Total Cash4.29BN/A-
Total Debt256B1.18B21,787%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
MS
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6676
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2226
SMR RATING
1..100
510
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3028
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MS's Valuation (28) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SF (84). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (26). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (10). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (53). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (30). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBDX23.55-0.07
-0.30%
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corp ETF
XBJA24.65-0.18
-0.71%
Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF Jan
IVW68.05-0.99
-1.43%
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
CEFA26.67-0.43
-1.59%
Global X S&P Cthlc Vls Dvlpd ex-US ETF
FBCG28.47-0.49
-1.69%
Fidelity® Blue Chip Growth ETF