MS
Price
$96.62
Change
-$1.56 (-1.59%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
35 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$83.82
Change
-$0.69 (-0.82%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
42 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MS vs SF

Header iconMS vs SF Comparison
Open Charts MS vs SFBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$96.62
Change-$1.56 (-1.59%)
Volume$7.8M
CapitalizationN/A
Stifel Financial
Price$83.82
Change-$0.69 (-0.82%)
Volume$282K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MS vs SF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
MS vs. SF commentary
Sep 11, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a Buy and SF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 11, 2024
Stock price -- (MS: $96.62 vs. SF: $83.82)
Brand notoriety: MS: Notable vs. SF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 123% vs. SF: 50%
Market capitalization -- MS: $153.98B vs. SF: $7.95B
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $153.98B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MS and SF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.67% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2024.

SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.24% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($154B) has a higher market cap than SF($7.95B). SF (18.06) and MS (18.06) have similar P/E ratio . SF YTD gains are higher at: 23.110 vs. MS (6.546). SF has less debt than MS: SF (1.18B) vs MS (276B). MS has higher revenues than SF: MS (50.7B) vs SF (4.29B).
MSSFMS / SF
Capitalization154B7.95B1,938%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.54623.11028%
P/E Ratio18.0618.06100%
Revenue50.7B4.29B1,182%
Total Cash4.29BN/A-
Total Debt276B1.18B23,469%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
MS
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8082
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1213
SMR RATING
1..100
511
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4926
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SF's Valuation (78) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (93). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (13). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (11). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (44). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (49). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MID57.170.29
+0.51%
American Century Mid Cap Gr Impact ETF
GAPR36.070.09
+0.24%
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buf ETF - Apr
GSEW74.280.05
+0.07%
Goldman Sachs Equal Wght US Lg Cp Eq ETF
GXTG22.52-0.09
-0.40%
Global X Thematic Growth ETF
VFH107.27-1.07
-0.99%
Vanguard Financials ETF