Advertisement
MSBPF vs PXGYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSBPF is a Hold and PXGYF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MSBPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePXGYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MSBPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PXGYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PXGYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PXGYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MSBPF (@Commercial Printing/Forms) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PXGYF (@Commercial Printing/Forms) price change was +5.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Commercial Printing/Forms industry was +0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.47%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Commercial Printing/Forms (+0.98% weekly)Commercial Printing/Forms industry includes companies that provide printing services, business forms, letterheads, commercial printing and product labels. Some companies in this business are also involved with pre-press operations and desktop publishing. Like many other businesses, the commercial printing industry has also been adopting newer technologies (like advanced digital high-speed inkjet) to up the ante on the modern-day digitally progressive enterprise landscape. Prominent players in this industry include Cimpress N.V., Deluxe Corporation and Ennis, Inc,. to name a few.
| MSBPF | PXGYF | MSBPF / PXGYF | |
| Capitalization | 759M | 925M | 82% |
| EBITDA | 21.1B | 1.11B | 1,903% |
| Gain YTD | -7.429 | 22.873 | -32% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.64 | 10.15 | 115% |
| Revenue | 81B | 6.15B | 1,316% |
| Total Cash | 52.2B | 2.98B | 1,752% |
| Total Debt | 18B | 98.7M | 18,237% |
PXGYF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 17 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MSBPF | PXGYF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 12% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
MSBPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MSBPF and RICOY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSBPF and RICOY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSBPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSBPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RICOY - MSBPF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| POGHF - MSBPF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RICOF - MSBPF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PXGYF - MSBPF | -7% Poorly correlated | N/A |
PXGYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PXGYF and SCS have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PXGYF and SCS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PXGYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PXGYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SCS - PXGYF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| POGHF - PXGYF | -4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RICOY - PXGYF | -5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MSBPF - PXGYF | -7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RICOF - PXGYF | -9% Poorly correlated | N/A |