MSC
Price
$3.85
Change
-$0.08 (-2.04%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
741.46M
37 days until earnings call
SCHYF
Price
$2.60
Change
-$0.35 (-11.86%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
22.13B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSC vs SCHYF

Header iconMSC vs SCHYF Comparison
Open Charts MSC vs SCHYFBanner chart's image
Studio City International Holdings
Price$3.85
Change-$0.08 (-2.04%)
Volume$11.23K
Capitalization741.46M
Sands China
Price$2.60
Change-$0.35 (-11.86%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization22.13B
MSC vs SCHYF Comparison Chart in %
MSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSC vs. SCHYF commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSC is a StrongBuy and SCHYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MSC: $3.85 vs. SCHYF: $2.60)
Brand notoriety: MSC and SCHYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSC: 44% vs. SCHYF: 28%
Market capitalization -- MSC: $741.46M vs. SCHYF: $22.13B
MSC [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $741.46M. SCHYF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $22.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $34.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCHYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCHYF is a better buy in the long-term than MSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCHYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCHYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCHYF is a better buy in the short-term than MSC.

Price Growth

MSC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -3.27% price change this week, while SCHYF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -5.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+1.25% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHYF($22.1B) has a higher market cap than MSC($741M). SCHYF YTD gains are higher at: 5.971 vs. MSC (-31.858). SCHYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.05B vs. MSC (273M). SCHYF has more cash in the bank: 985M vs. MSC (173M). MSC has less debt than SCHYF: MSC (2.18B) vs SCHYF (7.09B). SCHYF has higher revenues than MSC: SCHYF (7.02B) vs MSC (679M).
MSCSCHYFMSC / SCHYF
Capitalization741M22.1B3%
EBITDA273M2.05B13%
Gain YTD-31.8585.971-534%
P/E RatioN/A22.97-
Revenue679M7.02B10%
Total Cash173M985M18%
Total Debt2.18B7.09B31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSC vs SCHYF: Fundamental Ratings
MSC
SCHYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9415
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10045
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2365

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCHYF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as MSC (47) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to MSC’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MSC (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to MSC’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSC (94) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew significantly faster than MSC’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MSC (65) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to MSC’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSC (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSCSCHYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THD60.150.61
+1.02%
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF
AVIV68.290.50
+0.74%
Avantis International Large Cap Val ETF
BEEX25.870.11
+0.44%
BeeHive ETF
ITOT146.490.08
+0.05%
iShares Core S&P Total US Stock Mkt ETF
FCUS32.61-0.11
-0.34%
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF

MSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSC and CNTY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSC and CNTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSC
1D Price
Change %
MSC100%
-2.04%
CNTY - MSC
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
SCHYF - MSC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZR - MSC
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
WYNN - MSC
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.26%
FLL - MSC
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.90%
More

SCHYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHYF
1D Price
Change %
SCHYF100%
N/A
MCHVF - SCHYF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - SCHYF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
SCHYY - SCHYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
SJMHF - SCHYF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNMY - SCHYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.92%
More