Advertisement
MSC vs SCHYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSC is a Buy and SCHYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MSC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SCHYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCHYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SCHYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MSC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -2.41% price change this week, while SCHYF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.45%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+0.59% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| MSC | SCHYF | MSC / SCHYF | |
| Capitalization | 896M | 21B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 273M | 2.31B | 12% |
| Gain YTD | -17.699 | -3.403 | 520% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 18.36 | - |
| Revenue | 679M | 7.19B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 173M | 1.79B | 10% |
| Total Debt | 2.18B | 8.15B | 27% |
MSC | SCHYF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MSC's Valuation (45) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SCHYF (60) in the null industry. This means that MSC’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.
MSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SCHYF (100) in the null industry. This means that MSC’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSC (94) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew significantly faster than MSC’s over the last 12 months.
MSC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SCHYF (45) in the null industry. This means that MSC’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as MSC (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to MSC’s over the last 12 months.
| MSC | SCHYF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 21 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
MSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MSC and CNTY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSC and CNTY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC | 100% | -3.13% | ||
| CNTY - MSC | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.65% | ||
| SCHYF - MSC | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CZR - MSC | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.67% | ||
| VAC - MSC | 20% Poorly correlated | +4.38% | ||
| WYNN - MSC | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.55% | ||
More | ||||
SCHYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MCHVF - SCHYF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GXYYY - SCHYF | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.69% | ||
| SCHYY - SCHYF | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.44% | ||
| SJMHF - SCHYF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WYNMY - SCHYF | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.15% | ||
More | ||||