MSC
Price
$5.72
Change
+$0.02 (+0.35%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
59 days until earnings call
SCHYF
Price
$3.00
Change
-$0.04 (-1.32%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Ad is loading...

MSC vs SCHYF

Header iconMSC vs SCHYF Comparison
Open Charts MSC vs SCHYFBanner chart's image
Studio City International Holdings
Price$5.72
Change+$0.02 (+0.35%)
Volume$1.81K
CapitalizationN/A
Sands China
Price$3.00
Change-$0.04 (-1.32%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
MSC vs SCHYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSC vs. SCHYF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSC is a Hold and SCHYF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (MSC: $5.72 vs. SCHYF: $3.00)
Brand notoriety: MSC and SCHYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSC: 30% vs. SCHYF: 25%
Market capitalization -- MSC: $1.33B vs. SCHYF: $30.88B
MSC [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $1.33B. SCHYF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $30.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCHYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCHYF is a better buy in the long-term than MSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCHYF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCHYF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCHYF is a better buy in the short-term than MSC.

Price Growth

MSC (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -14.70% price change this week, while SCHYF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +7.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSC is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-1.93% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHYF($30.9B) has a higher market cap than MSC($1.34B). SCHYF YTD gains are higher at: 7.527 vs. MSC (-11.802). MSC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 153M vs. SCHYF (-339M). SCHYF has more cash in the bank: 766M vs. MSC (228M). MSC has less debt than SCHYF: MSC (2.35B) vs SCHYF (8.66B). SCHYF has higher revenues than MSC: SCHYF (2.17B) vs MSC (446M).
MSCSCHYFMSC / SCHYF
Capitalization1.34B30.9B4%
EBITDA153M-339M-45%
Gain YTD-11.8027.527-157%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue446M2.17B21%
Total Cash228M766M30%
Total Debt2.35B8.66B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSC vs SCHYF: Fundamental Ratings
MSC
SCHYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
931
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6137
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10088
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSC's Valuation (43) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCHYF (84) in the null industry. This means that MSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

MSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SCHYF (100) in the null industry. This means that MSC’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSC (93) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew significantly faster than MSC’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MSC (61) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to MSC’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as MSC (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to MSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSCSCHYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPHB89.911.56
+1.77%
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
QDF70.980.94
+1.35%
FlexShares Quality Dividend ETF
MVPS24.740.26
+1.06%
Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF
FBCV31.620.31
+0.99%
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF
XDQQ34.310.26
+0.75%
Innovator Gr 100 Acltd ETF™ Quarterly

SCHYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHYF
1D Price
Change %
SCHYF100%
N/A
MCHVF - SCHYF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - SCHYF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
SCHYY - SCHYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
SJMHF - SCHYF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNMY - SCHYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
More