Advertisement
MSC vs SCHYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSC is a Hold and SCHYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MSC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SCHYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
MSC (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -9.15% price change this week, while SCHYF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +3.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
MSC is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (+3.76% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| MSC | SCHYF | MSC / SCHYF | |
| Capitalization | 1.34B | 30.9B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 153M | -339M | -45% |
| Gain YTD | -49.027 | -24.598 | 199% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 446M | 2.17B | 21% |
| Total Cash | 228M | 766M | 30% |
| Total Debt | 2.35B | 8.66B | 27% |
MSC | SCHYF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MSC's Valuation (38) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SCHYF (70) in the null industry. This means that MSC’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.
MSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SCHYF (100) in the null industry. This means that MSC’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSC (91) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew significantly faster than MSC’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as MSC (90) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to MSC’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as MSC (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to MSC’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UBT | 15.75 | 0.25 | +1.61% |
| ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury | |||
| EFU | 11.56 | N/A | +0.02% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | |||
| AAA | 24.94 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Alternative AccessFirstPriorityCLO BdETF | |||
| DIVI | 34.95 | -0.05 | -0.14% |
| Franklin Intl Core Div Tlt Idx ETF | |||
| LRGE | 74.05 | -0.78 | -1.04% |
| ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | |||
MSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MSC and CNTY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSC and CNTY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| CNTY - MSC | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| LTRY - MSC | 22% Poorly correlated | +10.00% | ||
| SCHYF - MSC | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CZR - MSC | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| FLL - MSC | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.74% | ||
More | ||||
SCHYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MCHVF - SCHYF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GXYYY - SCHYF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| SCHYY - SCHYF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| SJMHF - SCHYF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WYNMY - SCHYF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||