Ad is loading...
MSCF
Price
$6.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 31 closing price
RAND
Price
$16.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

MSCF vs RAND

Header iconMSCF vs RAND Comparison
Open Charts MSCF vs RANDBanner chart's image
MSC INCOME FD
Price$6.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.2K
CapitalizationN/A
Rand Capital
Price$16.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$427
CapitalizationN/A
MSCF vs RAND Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSCF vs. RAND commentary
Nov 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCF is a Hold and RAND is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MSCF: $5.82 vs. RAND: $16.14)
Brand notoriety: MSCF and RAND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSCF: 100% vs. RAND: 10%
Market capitalization -- MSCF: $298.94M vs. RAND: $35.62M
MSCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $298.94M. RAND’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $35.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRAND’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MSCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RAND’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RAND is a better buy in the long-term than MSCF.

Price Growth

MSCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RAND (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

RAND is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSCF($299M) has a higher market cap than RAND($35.6M). RAND has higher P/E ratio than MSCF: RAND (5.45) vs MSCF (3.36). RAND YTD gains are higher at: 30.938 vs. MSCF (24.025). RAND has less debt than MSCF: RAND (16.2M) vs MSCF (473M). MSCF has higher revenues than RAND: MSCF (53.2M) vs RAND (9.26M).
MSCFRANDMSCF / RAND
Capitalization299M35.6M840%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.02530.93878%
P/E Ratio3.365.4562%
Revenue53.2M9.26M575%
Total CashN/A3.48M-
Total Debt473M16.2M2,920%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RAND: Fundamental Ratings
RAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FOA21.410.89
+4.34%
Finance of America Companies
SYK390.086.80
+1.77%
Stryker Corp
FBK55.83-0.38
-0.68%
FB Financial Corp
CAE21.75-0.24
-1.09%
CAE
RIGL24.10-3.36
-12.24%
Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc

MSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSCF and RAND have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSCF and RAND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSCF
1D Price
Change %
MSCF100%
N/A
RAND - MSCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIXXF - MSCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
ENFD - MSCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BENF - MSCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
HPH - MSCF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
More