Advertisement
AMG vs RAND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMG is a Buy and RAND is a StrongBuy.
AMG's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for AMG turned positive on November 11, 2026. Looking at past instances where AMG's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 41 of 56 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where AMG's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 15 of 21 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on AMG as a result. In 67 of 98 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
AMG moved above its 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +4.90% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AMG advanced for three days, in 209 of 330 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
AMG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 203 of 287 cases where AMG Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 71%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AMG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 7 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. AMG’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 77 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 84 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.090) is normal, around the industry mean (2.412). P/E Ratio (11.742) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-2.386). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.616) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.270) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.606) is also within normal values, averaging (15.694).
RAND's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for RAND turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where RAND's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 37 of 58 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
Following a +2.42% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RAND advanced for three days, in 123 of 196 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 28 of 58 cases where RAND's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 48%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 11, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on RAND as a result. In 49 of 119 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 41%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RAND declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 52%.
The Aroon Indicator for RAND entered a downward trend on November 05, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 3 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.568) is normal, around the industry mean (2.412). RAND's P/E Ratio (-328.333) is considerably lower than the industry average of (-2.386). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.118) settles around the average of (0.270) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (20.243) is also within normal values, averaging (15.694).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 40 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 69 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. RAND’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 90 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. RAND’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock worse than average.
AMG | RAND | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 69 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RAND's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMG (84) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that RAND’s stock grew significantly faster than AMG’s over the last 12 months.
AMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for RAND (94) in the null industry. This means that AMG’s stock grew significantly faster than RAND’s over the last 12 months.
AMG's SMR Rating (35) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RAND (90) in the null industry. This means that AMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than RAND’s over the last 12 months.
AMG's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as RAND (69) in the null industry. This means that AMG’s stock grew similarly to RAND’s over the last 12 months.
RAND's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMG (77) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that RAND’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMG’s over the last 12 months.
| AMG | RAND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 10 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 62% | 21 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 46% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RAND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RAND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMG’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RAND’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
- RAND’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +10.27% price change this week, while RAND (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMG is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-2.51% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
Advertisement
AMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMG has been loosely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMG jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
RAND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RAND and MSIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RAND and MSIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RAND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAND | 100% | N/A | ||
| MSIF - RAND | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| BCSF - RAND | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| CION - RAND | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| MGLD - RAND | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
| AMG - RAND | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PIE | 30.42 | 1.38 | +4.73% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) | |||
| AVEM | 87.10 | 1.99 | +2.34% |
| Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) | |||
| ARWG | 24.97 | 0.43 | +1.74% |
| Archer Growth ETF (ARWG) | |||
| LSGR | 43.33 | 0.40 | +0.93% |
| Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) | |||
| JGRW | 29.36 | 0.10 | +0.35% |
| Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) | |||