Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSCGX vs NAESX
MSCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MSCGX vs NAESX
Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Y3
Price$11.50
Change+$0.10 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
MSCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCGX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. MSCGX (1.66B). NAESX pays higher dividends than MSCGX: NAESX (1.28) vs MSCGX (0.91). MSCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MSCGX (20 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MSCGX (1.01) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). MSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MSCGX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. MSCGX (-1.95). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. MSCGX (19.37).
| MSCGX | NAESX | MSCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.17 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.17 | 594% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.587 | 2.781 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 153B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.28 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.95 | 8.46 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.78 | 34.15 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.37 | 66.66 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.04 | 114.71 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement