MSCLF
Price
$0.48
Change
-$0.02 (-4.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
85.35M
NEUP
Price
$12.45
Change
+$1.00 (+8.73%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
23.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSCLF vs NEUP

Header iconMSCLF vs NEUP Comparison
Open Charts MSCLF vs NEUPBanner chart's image
SATELLOS BIOSCIENCE
Price$0.48
Change-$0.02 (-4.00%)
Volume$14.65K
Capitalization85.35M
Neuphoria Therapeutics
Price$12.45
Change+$1.00 (+8.73%)
Volume$96.23K
Capitalization23.41M
MSCLF vs NEUP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEUP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSCLF vs. NEUP commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCLF is a StrongBuy and NEUP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MSCLF: $0.48 vs. NEUP: $12.45)
Brand notoriety: MSCLF and NEUP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSCLF: 35% vs. NEUP: 150%
Market capitalization -- MSCLF: $85.35M vs. NEUP: $23.41M
MSCLF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $85.35M. NEUP’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $23.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $97.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $1.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSCLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNEUP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MSCLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NEUP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEUP is a better buy in the long-term than MSCLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSCLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEUP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSCLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NEUP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSCLF is a better buy in the short-term than NEUP.

Price Growth

MSCLF (@Biotechnology) experienced а +6.32% price change this week, while NEUP (@Biotechnology) price change was +32.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +48.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+1.01% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSCLF($85.3M) has a higher market cap than NEUP($23.4M). MSCLF has higher P/E ratio than NEUP: MSCLF (2.62) vs NEUP (0.66). NEUP YTD gains are higher at: 262.974 vs. MSCLF (-18.186). NEUP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 192K vs. MSCLF (-21.39M). MSCLF has more cash in the bank: 38.2M vs. NEUP (17M). NEUP has higher revenues than MSCLF: NEUP (15.7M) vs MSCLF (0).
MSCLFNEUPMSCLF / NEUP
Capitalization85.3M23.4M365%
EBITDA-21.39M192K-11,141%
Gain YTD-18.186262.974-7%
P/E Ratio2.620.66396%
Revenue015.7M-
Total Cash38.2M17M225%
Total DebtN/A172K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSCLF: Fundamental Ratings
MSCLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSCLFNEUP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEUP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRPS0.850.05
+6.25%
PROPELLUS INC.
MARUY246.540.57
+0.23%
Marubeni Corp.
DSKIF24.00N/A
N/A
Daiseki Co., Ltd.
GLFGF0.40N/A
N/A
GLOBAL FASHION GROUP SA
ROHCY14.94-0.13
-0.86%
Rohm Co. Ltd.

MSCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSCLF and AKBLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSCLF and AKBLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSCLF
1D Price
Change %
MSCLF100%
N/A
AKBLF - MSCLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDIO - MSCLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.92%
IMMX - MSCLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
NRSN - MSCLF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.84%
NEUP - MSCLF
8%
Poorly correlated
+8.73%
More

NEUP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEUP has been loosely correlated with SYBX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NEUP jumps, then SYBX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEUP
1D Price
Change %
NEUP100%
+8.73%
SYBX - NEUP
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
BRNS - NEUP
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.63%
SLGL - NEUP
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
CMND - NEUP
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.91%
ENSC - NEUP
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More