Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSFKX vs RLBEX
MSFKX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts MSFKX vs RLBEX
MFS Total Return R6
Price$19.65
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.64B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$36.99
Change+$0.09 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.49B
MSFKX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSFKX vs. RLBEX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSFKX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. MSFKX (7.64B). MSFKX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: MSFKX (2.63) vs RLBEX (1.81). MSFKX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: MSFKX (13 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). RLBEX (0.59) is less costly to investors than MSFKX (0.40). MSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). MSFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: MSFKX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.77 vs. MSFKX (2.24). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.60 vs. MSFKX (11.54).
| MSFKX | RLBEX | MSFKX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.59 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.59 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.873 | 8.592 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.64B | 252B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 1.81 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.24 | 10.77 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.27 | 31.19 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.54 | 36.60 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.93 | 66.90 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement