Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSFKX vs RLBEX
MSFKX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts MSFKX vs RLBEX
MFS Total Return R6
Price$19.44
Change-$0.04 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.63B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$36.08
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.02B
MSFKX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSFKX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSFKX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 248B vs. MSFKX (7.63B). MSFKX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: MSFKX (2.66) vs RLBEX (1.90). MSFKX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: MSFKX (13 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). RLBEX (0.59) is less costly to investors than MSFKX (0.40). MSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). MSFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: MSFKX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. MSFKX (1.73). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 41.56 vs. MSFKX (16.77).
| MSFKX | RLBEX | MSFKX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.59 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.59 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.260 | 5.920 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.63B | 248B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 1.90 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.73 | 6.36 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.97 | 31.60 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.77 | 41.56 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.48 | 62.66 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement