Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSFKX vs RLBEX
MSFKX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts MSFKX vs RLBEX
MFS Total Return R6
Price$19.14
Change-$0.04 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.55B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$35.69
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.73B
MSFKX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSFKX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSFKX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. MSFKX (7.55B). MSFKX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: MSFKX (2.66) vs RLBEX (1.90). MSFKX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: MSFKX (13 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). RLBEX (0.59) is less costly to investors than MSFKX (0.40). MSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). MSFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: MSFKX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. MSFKX (0.12). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.57 vs. MSFKX (9.71).
| MSFKX | RLBEX | MSFKX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.59 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.59 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.654 | 4.581 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 244B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 1.90 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.12 | 6.95 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.13 | 22.98 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.71 | 34.57 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.50 | 61.12 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement