MSGM
Price
$3.30
Change
+$0.17 (+5.43%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
16.76M
RSSS
Price
$2.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
83.74M
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSGM vs RSSS

Header iconMSGM vs RSSS Comparison
Open Charts MSGM vs RSSSBanner chart's image
Motorsport Games
Price$3.30
Change+$0.17 (+5.43%)
Volume$14.27K
Capitalization16.76M
Research Solutions
Price$2.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.16K
Capitalization83.74M
MSGM vs RSSS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSGM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSGM vs. RSSS commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGM is a Hold and RSSS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (MSGM: $3.30 vs. RSSS: $2.58)
Brand notoriety: MSGM and RSSS are both not notable
MSGM represents the Electronics/Appliances, while RSSS is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSGM: 37% vs. RSSS: 32%
Market capitalization -- MSGM: $16.76M vs. RSSS: $83.74M
MSGM [@Electronics/Appliances] is valued at $16.76M. RSSS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $83.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $344.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $12.91B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSGM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRSSS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MSGM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RSSS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MSGM and RSSS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSGM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSSS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSGM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RSSS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSGM is a better buy in the short-term than RSSS.

Price Growth

MSGM (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а +10.37% price change this week, while RSSS (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.80%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

RSSS is expected to report earnings on Sep 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronics/Appliances (+1.44% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

@Packaged Software (+0.49% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSSS($83.7M) has a higher market cap than MSGM($16.8M). MSGM YTD gains are higher at: 146.269 vs. RSSS (-37.831). RSSS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.09M vs. MSGM (2M). RSSS has more cash in the bank: 9.85M vs. MSGM (1.05M). RSSS has higher revenues than MSGM: RSSS (48.8M) vs MSGM (7.42M).
MSGMRSSSMSGM / RSSS
Capitalization16.8M83.7M20%
EBITDA2M3.09M65%
Gain YTD146.269-37.831-387%
P/E Ratio0.59N/A-
Revenue7.42M48.8M15%
Total Cash1.05M9.85M11%
Total Debt41.1KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RSSS: Fundamental Ratings
RSSS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSGMRSSS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSGM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSBI17.560.34
+1.97%
Midland States Bancorp
FOX49.190.13
+0.26%
Fox Corp
RRGB5.68N/A
N/A
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
JDZG1.70-0.19
-10.05%
Jiade Limited

RSSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSSS and MSGM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSSS and MSGM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSSS
1D Price
Change %
RSSS100%
N/A
MSGM - RSSS
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.43%
BMBL - RSSS
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
SPT - RSSS
25%
Poorly correlated
-13.20%
NXTT - RSSS
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.94%
ARBE - RSSS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More