Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGUX vs RGACX
MSGUX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSGUX vs RGACX
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth C
Price$57.29
Change+$0.41 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.97B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.09
Change+$0.64 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
MSGUX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGUX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGUX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. MSGUX (4.97B). RGACX pays higher dividends than MSGUX: RGACX (0.07) vs MSGUX (0.00). MSGUX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSGUX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). MSGUX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). MSGUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSGUX: RGACX (250) vs MSGUX (1000). MSGUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.31 vs. RGACX (14.19). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.04 vs. MSGUX (-27.94).
| MSGUX | RGACX | MSGUX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.94 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.94 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.268 | 19.586 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.97B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.31 | 14.19 | 510% |
| Returns for 3 years | 111.53 | 74.27 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.94 | 40.04 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.41 | 101.32 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement