Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGZX vs WCMLX
MSGZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSGZX vs WCMLX
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq I
Price$16.95
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets565.03M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13M
MSGZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGZX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSGZX has more cash in the bank: 565M vs. WCMLX (41.1M). MSGZX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSGZX (0.03) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSGZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSGZX (15 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSGZX (0.85). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. MSGZX (54.00). MSGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSGZX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.18 vs. MSGZX (-2.51). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.99 vs. MSGZX (-10.42).
| MSGZX | WCMLX | MSGZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.99 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.79 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.960 | 1.400 | 354% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 565M | 41.1M | 1,375% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.51 | -2.18 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.11 | 20.96 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.42 | -0.99 | 1,055% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.25 | N/A | - |