Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGZX vs WCMLX
MSGZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSGZX vs WCMLX
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq I
Price$16.31
Change+$0.15 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets543.63M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.10
Change+$0.15 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.68M
MSGZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGZX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSGZX has more cash in the bank: 544M vs. WCMLX (43.7M). MSGZX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSGZX (0.03) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSGZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSGZX (15 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSGZX (0.85). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. MSGZX (54.00). MSGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSGZX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.23 vs. MSGZX (-0.04). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.98 vs. MSGZX (3.32).
| MSGZX | WCMLX | MSGZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.99 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.79 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.186 | 0.700 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 544M | 43.7M | 1,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.04 | 0.23 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.13 | 21.94 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.32 | 22.98 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement