Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGZX vs WCMLX
MSGZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSGZX vs WCMLX
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq I
Price$16.87
Change+$0.22 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets547.42M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.58
Change+$0.21 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.98M
MSGZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGZX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSGZX has more cash in the bank: 547M vs. WCMLX (45M). MSGZX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSGZX (0.03) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSGZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSGZX (15 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSGZX (0.85). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. MSGZX (54.00). MSGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSGZX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. MSGZX (5.53). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.93 vs. MSGZX (4.71).
| MSGZX | WCMLX | MSGZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.99 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.79 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.588 | 5.599 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 547M | 45M | 1,216% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.53 | 6.59 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.54 | 28.23 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.71 | 20.93 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement