Ad is loading...
MSGZX vs WCMLX
MSGZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSGZX vs WCMLX
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq I
Price$13.73
Change+$0.08 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets508.7M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.81
Change+$0.10 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.8M
MSGZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGZX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSGZX has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. WCMLX (38.8M). MSGZX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSGZX (0.03) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSGZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSGZX (14 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MSGZX (0.85). MSGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). MSGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSGZX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). MSGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.75 vs. WCMLX (-12.36). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 23.25 vs. MSGZX (9.35).
| MSGZX | WCMLX | MSGZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.99 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.86 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.375 | -16.719 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 509M | 38.8M | 1,312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.75 | -12.36 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.76 | -8.07 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.35 | 23.25 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...