Ad is loading...
MSGZX vs WCMLX
MSGZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSGZX vs WCMLX
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq I
Price$14.83
Change+$0.21 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets543.46M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.80
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
MSGZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGZX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGZX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSGZX has more cash in the bank: 543M vs. WCMLX (42.1M). MSGZX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSGZX (0.03) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSGZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSGZX (14 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MSGZX (0.85). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. MSGZX (54.00). MSGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSGZX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). MSGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.10 vs. WCMLX (-6.86). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.31 vs. MSGZX (7.01).
| MSGZX | WCMLX | MSGZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.99 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.86 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.361 | -9.253 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 543M | 42.1M | 1,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.10 | -6.86 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.00 | 15.89 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.01 | 21.31 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...