Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHOX vs RGEBX
MSHOX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MSHOX vs RGEBX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.74
Change-$0.13 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.59M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.86
Change-$0.14 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
MSHOX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHOX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHOX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHOX (5.6M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: MSHOX (1.10) vs RGEBX (0.00). MSHOX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MSHOX (5 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: RGEBX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.04 vs. MSHOX (13.92). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. MSHOX (11.09).
| MSHOX | RGEBX | MSHOX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.09 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 13.89 | 1.09 | 1,274% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.721 | 17.385 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.6M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.92 | 17.04 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.81 | 57.65 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.09 | 45.42 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement