Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHOX vs RGEBX
MSHOX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MSHOX vs RGEBX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.71M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$85.55
Change+$0.58 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.99B
MSHOX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHOX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHOX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. MSHOX (5.71M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: MSHOX (1.10) vs RGEBX (0.00). MSHOX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MSHOX (6 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: RGEBX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. MSHOX (11.32). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. MSHOX (4.94).
| MSHOX | RGEBX | MSHOX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.09 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 13.89 | 1.09 | 1,274% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.393 | 19.751 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.71M | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 13.49 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.17 | 66.77 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.94 | 40.08 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement