Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHOX vs RGEBX
MSHOX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MSHOX vs RGEBX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.97
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.72M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.79
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
MSHOX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHOX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHOX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. MSHOX (5.73M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: MSHOX (1.10) vs RGEBX (0.00). MSHOX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MSHOX (6 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: RGEBX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.91 vs. MSHOX (13.87). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.77 vs. MSHOX (11.01).
| MSHOX | RGEBX | MSHOX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.09 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 13.89 | 1.09 | 1,274% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.604 | 18.687 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.73M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.87 | 14.91 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.69 | 65.25 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.01 | 43.77 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement