Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHOX vs RGEBX
MSHOX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MSHOX vs RGEBX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$13.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.36M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.38
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
MSHOX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHOX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHOX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. MSHOX (5.36M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: MSHOX (1.10) vs RGEBX (0.00). MSHOX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MSHOX (6 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: RGEBX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.15 vs. MSHOX (2.36). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. MSHOX (-3.80).
| MSHOX | RGEBX | MSHOX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.09 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 13.89 | 1.09 | 1,274% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.776 | 15.314 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.36M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.36 | 6.15 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.50 | 60.18 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.80 | 30.81 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement