Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHPX vs RGACX
MSHPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSHPX vs RGACX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$15.62
Change-$0.19 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.78M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.45
Change-$0.56 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
MSHPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHPX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHPX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. MSHPX (5.78M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MSHPX (2.20) vs RGACX (0.07). MSHPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSHPX (6 years) vs RGACX (23 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: RGACX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). MSHPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.35 vs. RGACX (14.51). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.62 vs. MSHPX (15.14).
| MSHPX | RGACX | MSHPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.50 | 0.94 | 1,117% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.516 | 18.697 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78M | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 0.07 | 3,172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.35 | 14.51 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.19 | 72.98 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.14 | 40.62 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement