Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHPX vs RGACX
MSHPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSHPX vs RGACX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$14.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.36M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.12
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
MSHPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHPX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHPX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. MSHPX (5.36M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MSHPX (2.20) vs RGACX (0.07). MSHPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSHPX (6 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: RGACX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. MSHPX (4.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.00 vs. MSHPX (3.35).
| MSHPX | RGACX | MSHPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.50 | 0.94 | 1,117% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.984 | 15.460 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.36M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 0.07 | 3,244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.08 | 6.37 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.95 | 61.11 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.35 | 32.00 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement