Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHPX vs RGEBX
MSHPX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MSHPX vs RGEBX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$15.62
Change-$0.19 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.78M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.70
Change-$0.55 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
MSHPX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHPX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHPX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. MSHPX (5.78M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: MSHPX (2.20) vs RGEBX (0.00). MSHPX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MSHPX (6 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: RGEBX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). MSHPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.35 vs. RGEBX (14.27). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.33 vs. MSHPX (15.14).
| MSHPX | RGEBX | MSHPX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.09 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.50 | 1.09 | 963% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.516 | 18.561 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78M | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.35 | 14.27 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.19 | 72.01 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.14 | 39.33 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement