Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHPX vs RGEBX
MSHPX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MSHPX vs RGEBX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$15.61
Change-$0.10 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.68M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.10
Change-$0.41 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
MSHPX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHPX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHPX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. MSHPX (5.68M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: MSHPX (2.20) vs RGEBX (0.00). MSHPX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MSHPX (5 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: RGEBX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.90 vs. MSHPX (14.30). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.66 vs. MSHPX (20.54).
| MSHPX | RGEBX | MSHPX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.09 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.50 | 1.09 | 963% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.953 | 17.721 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.68M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.30 | 15.90 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.80 | 59.93 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.54 | 44.66 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers