MSLOF
Price
$32.63
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
11.16B
WTSHF
Price
$18.56
Change
+$0.11 (+0.60%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSLOF vs WTSHF

Header iconMSLOF vs WTSHF Comparison
Open Charts MSLOF vs WTSHFBanner chart's image
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines
Price$32.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization11.16B
Westshore Terminals Investment
Price$18.56
Change+$0.11 (+0.60%)
Volume$2.47K
Capitalization1.15B
MSLOF vs WTSHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSLOF vs. WTSHF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSLOF is a Buy and WTSHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MSLOF: $32.63 vs. WTSHF: $18.56)
Brand notoriety: MSLOF and WTSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSLOF: 86% vs. WTSHF: 26%
Market capitalization -- MSLOF: $11.16B vs. WTSHF: $1.15B
MSLOF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $11.16B. WTSHF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSLOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWTSHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MSLOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WTSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MSLOF and WTSHF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSLOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTSHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSLOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • WTSHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSLOF is a better buy in the short-term than WTSHF.

Price Growth

MSLOF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WTSHF (@Marine Shipping) price change was -1.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+1.10% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSLOF($11.2B) has a higher market cap than WTSHF($1.15B). WTSHF has higher P/E ratio than MSLOF: WTSHF (15.50) vs MSLOF (4.07). WTSHF YTD gains are higher at: 17.534 vs. MSLOF (-6.771). MSLOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 505B vs. WTSHF (196M). MSLOF has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. WTSHF (89.6M). WTSHF has less debt than MSLOF: WTSHF (441M) vs MSLOF (1.37T). MSLOF has higher revenues than WTSHF: MSLOF (1.74T) vs WTSHF (392M).
MSLOFWTSHFMSLOF / WTSHF
Capitalization11.2B1.15B975%
EBITDA505B196M257,653%
Gain YTD-6.77117.534-39%
P/E Ratio4.0715.5026%
Revenue1.74T392M443,367%
Total Cash148B89.6M165,179%
Total Debt1.37T441M310,658%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSLOF vs WTSHF: Fundamental Ratings
MSLOF
WTSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4880
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5171
SMR RATING
1..100
1054
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8838
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSLOF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as WTSHF (25). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew similarly to WTSHF’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as WTSHF (71). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew similarly to WTSHF’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTSHF (54). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTSHF’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as WTSHF (62). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew similarly to WTSHF’s over the last 12 months.

WTSHF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSLOF (88). This means that WTSHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSLOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSLOFWTSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGSR10.640.07
+0.66%
Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF
NFRA62.820.18
+0.29%
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infras ETF
BSMW24.480.02
+0.08%
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Muncpl Bd ETF
LENS29.79-0.02
-0.08%
Sarmaya Thematic ETF
ADIV18.05-0.15
-0.82%
SmartETFs Asia Pcfc Dvdnd Bldr ETF

MSLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSLOF and HPGLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSLOF and HPGLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSLOF
1D Price
Change %
MSLOF100%
N/A
HPGLY - MSLOF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAKKF - MSLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLAGF - MSLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
WTSHF - MSLOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
MPZZF - MSLOF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.48%
More

WTSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WTSHF and CKNHF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WTSHF and CKNHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTSHF
1D Price
Change %
WTSHF100%
+0.60%
CKNHF - WTSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSLOF - WTSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOIEF - WTSHF
19%
Poorly correlated
+4.06%
DPBSF - WTSHF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIM - WTSHF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
More