Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSCX vs NRGSX
MSSCX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts MSSCX vs NRGSX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth I
Price$9.01
Change+$0.06 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.27M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
MSSCX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSCX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSCX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. MSSCX (73.3M). MSSCX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: MSSCX (4.37) vs NRGSX (0.07). MSSCX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: MSSCX (28 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). MSSCX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). MSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSSCX: NRGSX (0) vs MSSCX (100000). MSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.12 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). MSSCX return over 5 years is better than : -9.86 vs. NRGSX (-11.01).
| MSSCX | NRGSX | MSSCX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.74 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.74 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.936 | -7.590 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.3M | 8.19B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.37 | 0.07 | 6,607% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.12 | -14.62 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.55 | -4.10 | -673% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.86 | -11.01 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.73 | 3.70 | -886% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement